Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-15 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > Even with a clean trace, I have a hard time understanding how it could > happen. Unfortunately, rdxtrees are currently unsafe to use without general (sleep) locks, since they can allocate memory in the middle of an operation. So yes,

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Richard Braun, le Wed 08 Jul 2015 20:49:14 +0200, a écrit : > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:59:58PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > A way to reproduce this workload is using pbuilder instead of building > > in a system with dependencies already installed. > > FYI, pbuilder on sid fails because of

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-08 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:59:58PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > A way to reproduce this workload is using pbuilder instead of building > in a system with dependencies already installed. FYI, pbuilder on sid fails because of 1/ procfs: Too many arguments Try `procfs --help' or `procfs --usage'

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 07 Jul 2015 16:40:27 +0200, a écrit : > This box keeps building installing packages, building a package, > deinstalling packages. A way to reproduce this workload is using pbuilder instead of building in a system with dependencies already installed. Samuel

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > It looks like there is discrepancy between ipc/ipc_object.c:660 and > > kern/rdxtree.h:94. Can you manage to get -O0 traces ? > > I'll try that. Even with a clean trace, I have a hard time understanding how it could happen. I t

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:33:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I got another hit, I have attached the screenshot, and here are the > addrlines: This is scary. Justus and I never saw anything wrong in a month with regular builds of iceweasel/hurd/glibc packages, and you get two assertions in a

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Richard Braun, le Tue 07 Jul 2015 16:33:22 +0200, a écrit : > This is scary. Justus and I never saw anything wrong in a month > with regular builds of iceweasel/hurd/glibc packages, and you get > two assertions in a few days... Actually I had another one, but with same unavailability of a backtrac

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
I got another hit, I have attached the screenshot, and here are the addrlines: /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:97 /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:66 /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.c:233 /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.h:94 /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 07 Jul 2015 00:33:50 +0200, a écrit : > and here are the addrlines (in the debian package source with debian patches applied). Samuel

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-06 Thread Richard Braun
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:32:42PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I got a rdxtree-related assertion error, here is a snapshot. Well, that's unfortunate :-/. Node insertion is quite a low level function, we'd need a more complete trace to get a direction where to look. -- Richard Braun

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 06 Jul 2015 14:32:42 +0200, a écrit : > I got a rdxtree-related assertion error, here is a snapshot. (that was while building the musescore package) Samuel

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I got a rdxtree-related assertion error, here is a snapshot. Samuel

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 10:55:55 +0200, a écrit : > Pino Toscano, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 10:06:48 +0200, a écrit : > > On 2015-07-05 09:41, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >Samuel Thibault, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 02:52:56 +0200, a écrit : > > >>It also includes the latest fakeroot-hurd permission fi

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 10:06:48 +0200, a écrit : > On 2015-07-05 09:41, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Samuel Thibault, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 02:52:56 +0200, a écrit : > >>It also includes the latest fakeroot-hurd permission fixes. > > > >It seems there are still some corner cases, see for instan

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-05 Thread Pino Toscano
On 2015-07-05 09:41, Samuel Thibault wrote: Samuel Thibault, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 02:52:56 +0200, a écrit : It also includes the latest fakeroot-hurd permission fixes. It seems there are still some corner cases, see for instance liggghts: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liggghts&a

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

2015-07-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 05 Jul 2015 02:52:56 +0200, a écrit : > It also includes the latest fakeroot-hurd permission fixes. It seems there are still some corner cases, see for instance liggghts: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liggghts&arch=hurd-i386&ver=3.2.0%2Brepack1-2&stamp=1436