Damien Genet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> or don't use automake, whereas parted use automake (really ugly)
You don't have to use libtool just because you use automake (just as
you don't have to use automake just because you use autoconf).
Put the rules for building the shared library into Make
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 02:23:54AM +0200, Damien Genet wrote:
> add an installation rule to link from the real library to the needed
> name
> or don't use automake, whereas parted use automake (really ugly)
> or change the needed name ;)
Or make the library no-inst and install it under the requir
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:58:44PM -0400, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> What we are looking for, essentially, is to either make the Hurd
> conform to the libtools' naming scheme or vica verse. Looking at
> /lib on my system does not make it clear to me that one is preferred
> over the other; both see
> Le ven 12/04/2002 à 21:05, Roland McGrath a écrit :
> > That is not relevant. You can always add your own rules.
>
> you mean, supply my own Makefile ?
> but then i would have to support all the esoteric rules that parted
> support via automake, ie: dist, dist-check, mostlyclean, distclean
> m
> sorry still the same problem, whatever i do, i can't find a clean way to
> name the parted module libstore_part.so.0.2 with automake
Allow me to add a detail or two. Using libstore, it appears that we
can only create libraries with the names of the form
`libstore_part-0.2.so'. The code in lib
salut,
Le ven 12/04/2002 à 21:05, Roland McGrath a écrit :
> That is not relevant. You can always add your own rules.
you mean, supply my own Makefile ?
but then i would have to support all the esoteric rules that parted
support via automake, ie: dist, dist-check, mostlyclean, distclean
maintai
salut,
sorry still the same problem, whatever i do, i can't find a clean way to
name the parted module libstore_part.so.0.2 with automake
i thougt about different solutions :
add an installation rule to link from the real library to the needed
name
or don't use automake, whereas parted use auto
> salut,
>
>
> Le jeu 11/04/2002 à 20:21, Roland McGrath a écrit :
> > I don't know what libtool's scheme is. I'm not sure you really need to use
> > libtool for making the store module, since you build it only for Hurd
> > anyway and on Hurd you can always assume GNU tools and ELF standards.
>
salut,
Le jeu 11/04/2002 à 20:21, Roland McGrath a écrit :
> I don't know what libtool's scheme is. I'm not sure you really need to use
> libtool for making the store module, since you build it only for Hurd
> anyway and on Hurd you can always assume GNU tools and ELF standards.
parted use aut
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:55:48PM +0200, Damien Genet wrote:
> 2) this break libtool versionning scheme
Use the full name including the version number and specify
-module -avoid-version
for _LDFLAGS (see also the modules documentation in the libtool
documentation).
Mmh. I have actually never t
salut,
i'm working on moving the parted store module, to parted sources, on
neal's request
currently, store modules need to follow the following naming scheme :
"libstore_*.STORE_SONAME_SUFFIX"
where STORE_SONAME_SUFFIX is "so.0.2", and 0.2 is the Hurd version,
how
11 matches
Mail list logo
