Mats Erik Andersson ha escrit:
> Thus I draw the conclusion that the build files `*/Makefile' are incomplete,
> since their interpretation depends on their order of application.
This is normal: a Makefile in a subdirectory is not responsible for any
prerequisites outside this subdirectory. You
As a side noe, a missing build target "../lib/libgnu.a" is easily produced:
$ ./configure CFLAGS="-Wall"
$ gmake clean
$ gmake -C talk/
[...]
make: *** No rule to make target `../lib/libgnu.a', needed by `talk'. Stop
Thus I draw the conclusion that the build
onsdag den 3 november 2010 klockan 12:16 skrev Alfred M. Szmidt detta:
>
>Hello all,
>
>I have noticed all along that the different binaries do not
>specify "libinetutils.a" as a build target prerequisite. This
>is awkward when tracking down bugs. Is this intentional of some
>
onsdag den 3 november 2010 klockan 12:16 skrev Alfred M. Szmidt detta:
>
>Hello all,
>
>I have noticed all along that the different binaries do not
>specify "libinetutils.a" as a build target prerequisite. This
>is awkward when tracking down bugs. Is this intentional of some
>
Hello all,
I have noticed all along that the different binaries do not
specify "libinetutils.a" as a build target prerequisite. This
is awkward when tracking down bugs. Is this intentional of some
obscure reason?
Which programs do not depend on libinetutils?
Hello all,
I have noticed all along that the different binaries do not
specify "libinetutils.a" as a build target prerequisite. This
is awkward when tracking down bugs. Is this intentional of some
obscure reason?
Regards,
Mats
