Hi Yuri,
* Pooh wrote on Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:01:57PM CET:
>
> Why not have both versions for these intermediate libraries, and when
> producing final executable or shared library use the needed, depending
> on the flags - use non-PIC version for executable, if for example
> -static is spec
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Kaiser wrote on Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:07:16PM CET:
> Some documentation typos.
Thanks! Applied to branch-1-5 (all fixed in HEAD already).
Cheers,
Ralf
2005-12-16 Nicolas Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/libtool.texi: Fix some documentation typos.
Index: doc/
Hi Kurt,
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:17:28PM CET:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:26:22AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > old-m4-iface.at:135: $AUTOCONF --force
> > > stderr:
> > > Usage: autoconf [-h] [--help] [-m dir] [--macrodir=dir]
> > >[-l dir] [--localdir=di
Good day!
I want to build from a set of sources an intermediate library (PIC
version, to link it into a shared library afterwards), and from the same
sources with the same flags a static intermediate library (from non-PIC
objects).
When i compile a source file, two files are generated, a PIC o