Hello Roberto,
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:48:07AM CET:
>
> I got errors on a Fedora 7 system (x86_64): the log file
> is attached. I have also tried using Libtool 2.2 on one
> of my projets, but I get the following:
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DH
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:40:58AM -0500, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Salut Sylvain,
>
> On 2 Mar 2008, at 09:24, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> I downloaded 2.2 today and started reading the documentation. It
>> makes reference to a 'demo' (aka GNU hell) directory which is present
>> in 1.5.26 but missin
Salut Sylvain,
On 2 Mar 2008, at 09:24, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
I downloaded 2.2 today and started reading the documentation. It
makes reference to a 'demo' (aka GNU hell) directory which is present
in 1.5.26 but missing in 2.2. Do you plan to include it there too?
The tests have moved to the
Hi,
I downloaded 2.2 today and started reading the documentation. It
makes reference to a 'demo' (aka GNU hell) directory which is present
in 1.5.26 but missing in 2.2. Do you plan to include it there too?
Cheers,
--
Sylvain
___
Bug-libtool mailing
Hello Jens,
* Jens Schleusener wrote on Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:01:19AM CET:
>
> congratulations for releasing GNU Libtool 2.2!
>
> But probably you have enjoyed too many (doubtless hard-earned) bottles of
> champagne ...
>
> ... or how is the date
>
> Saturday, March 1st 2009, 22:22:22
>
> on t
Hi,
congratulations for releasing GNU Libtool 2.2!
But probably you have enjoyed too many (doubtless hard-earned) bottles of
champagne ...
... or how is the date
Saturday, March 1st 2009, 22:22:22
on top of the page
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/news.html
to understand ;-)
Regard
Hi Neil,
* Neil Roberts wrote on Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:24:22PM CET:
>
> As I understand it, when linking a shared library libtool checks
> whether all of the dependencies are found and that they are valid
> libraries. In the old version of libtool it just did this using
> objdump which reports
