On 6/5/07, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 16:04 -0600, deckrider wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, why does AC_PROG_CPP set CPP="" for you?
>
> Not sure, but in the
On 6/5/07, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 14:29 -0600, deckrider wrote:
> On 6/5/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/30/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't know wheth
On 6/5/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/30/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know whether this is a bug or not ...
>
> I'm on:
>
> $ uname -a
> HP-UX omztdv1 B.11.23 U ia64 2505142627 unlimited-user license
>
> $ libto
On 5/30/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know whether this is a bug or not ...
I'm on:
$ uname -a
HP-UX omztdv1 B.11.23 U ia64 2505142627 unlimited-user license
$ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.23b (1.1220.2.437 2007/02/17 09:08:45)
$ au
I don't know whether this is a bug or not ...
I'm on:
$ uname -a
HP-UX omztdv1 B.11.23 U ia64 2505142627 unlimited-user license
$ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.23b (1.1220.2.437 2007/02/17 09:08:45)
$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.10
$ autoconf --version
autocon
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.23b (1.1220.2.437 2007/02/17 09:08:45)
ia64-hp-hpux11.23
I'm seeing the following behavior:
$ ./libtool --mode=execute ldd foo
./libtool[6827]: LANG: not found.
./libtool[6827]: LC_ALL: not found.
./libtool[6827]: LC_CTYPE: not found.
./libtool[6827]: LC_COLLATE:
Hello,
I ran libtool 1.5.23b tests on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 and alphaev56-dec-osf4.0f.
ia64-hp-hpux11.23 had only one fail: hardcode.test.
alphaev56-dec-osf4.0f. reported that All 103 tests passed, even though
this came out during the test cycle:
PASS: demo-inst.test
PASS: hardcode.test
31897:.lib
