* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:02:31PM CEST:
* Eric Sandall wrote on Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:54:23PM CEST:
Without g++ installed:
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
(Example is from compiling pkgconfig):
Without g++ installed:
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor /lib/cpp
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Eric,
* Eric Sandall wrote on Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:54:23PM CEST:
Without g++ installed:
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run
Hi Eric,
* Eric Sandall wrote on Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:54:23PM CEST:
Without g++ installed:
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
Quoting Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
The problems I have heard about up until now have been that autoconf
found a C++ compiler, but it was discovered not to work. In this
case, autoconf's macro throws up its hands and spontaneously quits.
So libtool is not working if there is no
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Eric Sandall wrote:
This failure is not really new. It has been happening since the original
1.5 release. Maybe a fix was removed?
Not sure, but my testing shows that 0.15.0 compiled fine without g++
installed.
The problems I have heard about up until now have been
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yes. Known bug, fixed properly in branch-2-0. Unfortunately I don't
know of a clean workaround for branch-1-5, and we have a handful of
patches (at least, and one of them tricky) that need to go into
branch-2-0 before we can release the next
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Eric Sandall wrote:
Can't the changes from 0.15.0 to 0.16.2 that broke the CXX check just be
reverted? I'm probably thinking too simplisticly.
This failure is not really new. It has been happening since the
original 1.5 release. Maybe a fix was removed?
Will 2.0 be
Quoting Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Eric Sandall wrote:
Can't the changes from 0.15.0 to 0.16.2 that broke the CXX check just be
reverted? I'm probably thinking too simplisticly.
This failure is not really new. It has been happening since the
original 1.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| Eric Sandall wrote:
| | Quoting Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| | snip
| |
| | The problems I have heard about up until now have been that autoconf
| | found a C++ compiler, but it was discovered not to work. In this
| |
Quoting Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
Replying to myself... it is still fixed. Please use a newer libtool.
http://www.opendarwin.org/~pogma/lt_no_cxx.txt
I was using 1.5.16, will try 1.5.18, thanks. :)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall| Source Mage GNU/Linux
Eric Sandall wrote:
Quoting Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
Replying to myself... it is still fixed. Please use a newer libtool.
http://www.opendarwin.org/~pogma/lt_no_cxx.txt
I was using 1.5.16, will try 1.5.18, thanks. :)
Was also fixed in 1.5.16. If your configure script is
12 matches
Mail list logo
