thanks, fixed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This appears several times.
>
>
> ___
> Bug-lilypond mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1. (Bug) If you have a -- and there are no more notes, LilyPond segfaults.
>
> 2. (More of a suggestion) If you have a __ on the last note of the piece,
> LilyPond gives an error. It could perhaps give a warning, but shouldn't
> give an error.
Please send .ly examples.
1. (Bug) If you have a -- and there are no more notes, LilyPond segfaults.
2. (More of a suggestion) If you have a __ on the last note of the piece,
LilyPond gives an error. It could perhaps give a warning, but shouldn't
give an error.
--
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/
canonize, v. to sanctify a
hi,
when there's no \paper block but a \midi block in my \score, I get these angry
messages, though everything works fine (apart from the other bugs I reported,
of course :) )
lilypond: warning: no LilyPond output found for `foo'
Running latex...
Running dvips...lilypond: error: `dvips' failed
Hi,
Sometimes I can't play lily's midi output. Changing something irrelevant can
fix the problem.
I'm using timidity for midi output. Attached are the midi files I get.
\version "2.1.26"
\score { % this produces playable output ...
\notes {<< \notes c2 >> }
\midi {\tempo 4=140}
}
\score { %
I'm not sure if I already reported this some time ago, but anyways:
In \midi output, ties are ignored. I.e., if you write
\score {\notes <<{c8 ~ c}>> \midi{ \tempo 4=100}}
then you will hear 2 tones, not one.
Erik
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMA
(B $BL$>5Bz9-9p"((B $B$4LBOG$*3]$1$7$F?=$7Lu$"$j$^$;$s!#(B
$BG[?.$O:#2s8B$j$G$9$N$G$4ITMW$JJ}$OBgJQ$*[EMAIL PROTECTED])(B
$B!|%3%s%9%?%s%H$KKh7n#5#0K|0J>e2T$0$=$N%3%D!&%N%&%O%&$H$O!)(B
$B!|LY$1$k$?$a$N%$%s%?!<%M%C%H%^!<%1%F%$%s%0$N4pK\$H$O!)(B
$B!|$3$l$^$G;n$_$?%$%s%?!<[EMAIL PR
$B$"$J$?$O$3$N%a!<%j%s%0%j%9%H(B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $B$N%a%s%P!<$G$O$"$j$^$;$s!#(B
(B
$B%a!<%j%s%0%j%9%H$K$D$$$F$N0lHLE*$J0FFb$O%a!<%k$NK\J8$K(B
(B
(Bguide
(B
$B$H=q$$$?%a!<%k$r(B
(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
$B08$KAw$k$HAw$i$l$F$-$^$9!#(B
(B
(B
(B
(B
(B_
Generic cialis (Regalis), at cheap prices.
Most places charge $20, we charge $5. Quite a difference.
Cialis is known as a Super-Víagra or Weekend-Víagra because its effects start sooner and last much longer.
Shipped worldwide.Your easy-to-use solution is here: http://www.medz4cheap.com/cia/?oxygen
This appears several times.
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
1. Comparing stem length between 2.1.18 and 2.1.25 I found that in 2.1.25
stems are longer. Is this intentional?
I attached two images from (almost) the same source. They illustrate the
problem.
I found this also on upstems in some situations.
Bert
<><>___
Hi!
The attachment contains a minimal patch to Documentation/user/GNUmakefile
which removes a call to sed(1) using the -i (inplace) option. I'm not
sure, but I think it's not POSIX conform and will probably fail on,
e.g., Solaris. At least it fails on my system with GNU sed 3.0.2.
Since the star
Example:
\times 2/3 { \tiny c8 \normalsize c c }
Bug: The '3' in the tuplet bracket is typeset with small font.
Greetings,
Bert
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I recently upgraded autoconf to 2.57 but I still get the warning listed below
when I run configure (2.1.x, including 2.1.26):
.
checking g++ version... 3.3
configure: WARNING: autoconf <= 2.57 with g++ >= 3.3 gettext test broken.
configure: WARNING: Trying gcc, cross thumbs.
> # checki
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 23 February 2004 12.38, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Hi guys,
Lilypond 2.1.26 is released. This release fixes a nasty memory
corruption error, which I finally found with Valgrind. I've also
patched GUILE so that similar bugs are easier to catch in the future.
However
> no need for a core dump, just run the binary in gdb,
>
>gdb lilypond-bin
>r kaboom.ly
>(crash)
>bt
I'm sorry, but..
~/lily/lilypond/lily/out$ gdb ./lilypond-bin
GNU gdb 5.3-debian
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Publ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> And.. sorry, I still can't create a core dump, even if lilypond-bin seems to
> contain debugging symbols (compiled with -g, and the file is big):
no need for a core dump, just run the binary in gdb,
gdb lilypond-bin
r kaboom.ly
(crash)
bt
--
Han-Wen N
On Monday 23 February 2004 12.38, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Lilypond 2.1.26 is released. This release fixes a nasty memory
> corruption error, which I finally found with Valgrind. I've also
> patched GUILE so that similar bugs are easier to catch in the future.
However, it still crash
Just a warning:
Note that this solutions requires more active support of the
packaging rules. This has been a problem with the Debian package,
where the package maintainer has not had the time to follow the
quick development of LilyPond so the installation has not always
been complete.
/Mats
Reu
Otherwise the uninstall won't also remove the 2.1.xx directory (as the
directory won't be empty until after the postun script).
--
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | fantasize, a. as big as fizzy orange
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Something’s gone wrong with relative tag, some lines are
one or two octave higher than they should, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Grace-notes.html#Grace%20notes
Bert
___
Bug-lilypond mailing lis
Does the RPM try to install something twice in the info dir? I get (with
2.1.26, when upgrading from 2.1.25, and the same from 2.1.24->2.1.25):
install-info: menu item `Glossary' already exists (music-glossary)
(or something very like that). And indeed Glossary appears twice, once
under "Miscella
> I would advise mimicking the debian approach, installing under TEXMF
> using symlinks, see debian/rules. Even better yet, have make install
> do this if it finds tetex, and move it out of specific distribution
> scripts.
That sounds good.
--
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | art, n. romanticize
> I welcome all proposals for better solutions,
Doing what Jan suggested, at least in the RPM, seems to be a good way of
sorting things out, at least for RPM-ed systems. After all, it's
reasonable to have only one version of lilypond installed as an RPM.
If people want multiple versions installed
Reuben Thomas wrote:
Yes, and separate scripts for xdvi, dvips, kdvi, gdvi, texi2dvi? I
don't think that this is a good approach.
Need it be scripts? Can't you just make a system call with the TEXMF shell
variable prepended, i.e.
TEXMF=blah
The problem is not the calls from within the lilypon
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> Perhaps best of all would simply be to install your stuff in TEXMF_LOCAL
>> (if it exists) and otherwise TEXMF. I'm happy to help with getting this
>> working if you think it's a good idea.
While I agree that the lilypond.sh (in fact Red Hat's profile.d) is a
bad idea,
> Yes, and separate scripts for xdvi, dvips, kdvi, gdvi, texi2dvi? I
> don't think that this is a good approach.
Need it be scripts? Can't you just make a system call with the TEXMF shell
variable prepended, i.e.
TEXMF=blah
> We explicitly put the version number in, to prevent lilypond from
>
I'm using what I think is the current version (shipped with LilyPond
2.1.25) and I'm having a few problems:
1. Much of my file keeps being coloured like a string. This happens when I
have a construction such as
words = \lyrics { ... }
and then later
\lyricsto "voice" \new Lyrics \words
After t
> I notice that subsection headings are rendered as h4, whereas "headings",
> which should be smaller, are h3.
The tag "@heading" should be visually equivalent to (unnumbered) @section.
"@subheading" and "@subsubheading" look like @subsection and @subsubsection
headings, respectively.
Does this e
> If you neither have a \midi or a \paper, LilyPond will
> assume that you just want paper output. However, as soon
> as you have a \midi block, LilyPond will only output MIDI
> unless you also have a \paper block.
OK, so maybe that should go in the manual.
--
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | medi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just ran into trouble, because I upgraded my tetex installation in the
> middle of a session, and the new installation had different paths. Since
> TEXMF was set as an environment variable by lilypond, when I tried to run
> latex afterwards it didn't have the right pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I think in English this rather endearing TeX-style warning message should
> be "Cross fingers".
:-)
(In Dutch the word "thumb" also a verb, meaning to cross fingers.)
fixed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
On Monday 23 February 2004 09.11, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Erik Sandberg writes:
> >> > 2.
> >> > ./autogen does not report when guile 1.6 header files are missing.
> >>
> >> huh? Are you sure?
> >>
> >> autogen runs configure, so it will complain as much as configure.
> >
> > Yes, but configure
It seems that the property setting syntax change has not yet made
it into the manual.
/Mats
Original Message
Subject: Re: Making Large-Print Music
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:11:04 -0500
From: Ruven Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
If you neither have a \midi or a \paper, LilyPond will
assume that you just want paper output. However, as soon
as you have a \midi block, LilyPond will only output MIDI
unless you also have a \paper block.
/Mats
Reuben Thomas wrote:
The manual says that \paper{} is required and several example
Erik Sandberg writes:
>> > 2.
>> > ./autogen does not report when guile 1.6 header files are missing.
>>
>> huh? Are you sure?
>>
>> autogen runs configure, so it will complain as much as configure.
>
> Yes, but configure doesn't complain. It seems that it doesn't search for its
> header files. A
36 matches
Mail list logo
