InnerStaffGroup brackets

2005-11-12 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Hi, Using LilyPond from CVS (2.7.16), it seems that InnerStaffGroup brackets are not translated to the left from the StaffGroup brackets, and thus not really visible: \version 2.7.16 \layout { raggedright = ##t } \new StaffGroup \new Staff { c' } \new InnerStaffGroup \new Staff { c' }

PianoStaff and repeat bars

2005-11-12 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Using LilyPond from CVS (2.7.16), a strange artefact can be seen on repeat bars, with PianoStaff: \version 2.7.16 \layout { raggedright = ##t } \new PianoStaff \new Staff { c'1 \bar :|: \break c'1 } \new Staff { c'1 c'1 } ___ bug-lilypond

\RemoveEmptyStaffContext not working

2005-11-12 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Using LilyPond from CVS (2.7.26), \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does not seem to work properly. See the example from http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Hiding-staves.html ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: PianoStaff and repeat bars

2005-11-12 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
fixed. Thanks! Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Using LilyPond from CVS (2.7.16), a strange artefact can be seen on repeat bars, with PianoStaff: \version 2.7.16 \layout { raggedright = ##t } \new PianoStaff \new Staff { c'1 \bar :|: \break c'1 } \new Staff { c'1 c'1 }

Re: InnerStaffGroup brackets

2005-11-12 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
fixed. Thanks! Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Hi, Using LilyPond from CVS (2.7.16), it seems that InnerStaffGroup brackets are not translated to the left from the StaffGroup brackets, and thus not really visible: \version 2.7.16 \layout { raggedright = ##t } \new StaffGroup \new Staff { c' }

Re: InnerStaffGroup brackets

2005-11-12 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: fixed. Thanks! How quick. Thank you. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Are these bugs?

2005-11-12 Thread Gilles
Hello. I didn't receive any acknowledgment to the following posts: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-10/msg00169.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-10/msg00168.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-11/msg00277.html Are these bugs? If

Re: Are these bugs?

2005-11-12 Thread Edward Neeman
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-11/msg00277.html Are these bugs? If not, what am I doing wrong? If yes, were they known? And are they already corrected in newer versions? The first two, I don't know. The last one I don't think used to be present, if you look in the old

Re: Tie regressions

2005-11-12 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erlend Aasland wrote: The new tie code fails to typeset this snippet correctly: \relative c''' { g ~ g a ~ a b ~ b c ~ c d8 ~ d e ~ e f ~ f g ~ g } Some ties are placed too high and some too low. Please see attached pdf-files (one from 2.6.3 and one from 2.7.12). This is fixed in CVS. --

Re: 2.7.7 new ties collide with dot

2005-11-12 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
This is fixed in CVS. Bertalan Fodor wrote: In some situation, ties collide with augmentation dot: \version 2.7.7 \score { \new Staff { \relative c' { { d'4. ~ d4 s4. } \\ { b d,4. ~ b d,4 s4. } } } }