Graham Percival escreveu:
Mike Dean wrote:
C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:41:1:
error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here
#
(if (pair? toplevel-scores)
C:/Program
Issue 277: Bus error with page-break-permission + line-break-permission +
ragged-right
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=277
Comment #5 by joeneeman:
Never mind, it was easier than I thought.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_11_17
--
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 277: Bus error with page-break-permission + line-break-permission +
ragged-right
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=277
Comment #5 by joeneeman:
Never mind, it was easier than I thought.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.16 gives the following error on code that worked on 2.11.15.2.
This happens on both x86 and Mac OS X (Mac doesn't segfault but gives
the same error message. I'm sorry I don't have enough time to give a
short piece of code at the moment. I need to get some parts out
On 2/6/07, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 277: Bus error with page-break-permission + line-break-permission +
ragged-right
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=277
Comment #5 by joeneeman:
Never mind, it was easier than I thought.
Issue
On 2/6/07, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.16 gives the following error on code that worked on 2.11.15.2.
This happens on both x86 and Mac OS X (Mac doesn't segfault but gives
the same error message. I'm sorry I don't have enough time to give a
short piece of code
Joe Neeman wrote:
On 2/6/07, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 277: Bus error with page-break-permission +
line-break-permission +
ragged-right
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=277
Comment #5 by joeneeman:
Never mind, it was easier than
Joe Neeman wrote:
On 2/6/07, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.16 gives the following error on code that worked on 2.11.15.2.
This happens on both x86 and Mac OS X (Mac doesn't segfault but gives
the same error message. I'm sorry I don't have enough time to give a
Issue 279: x-staff tuplets cause havoc
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=279
Comment #1 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A shorter example of cross-staff tuplet breakage:
\version quot;2.11.16quot;
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\score {
\new PianoStaff
lt;lt;
\new Staff =
Issue 279: x-staff tuplets cause havoc
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=279
Comment #2 by joeneeman:
I have a partial fix in branch jneeman. It successfuly delays
Tuplet_bracket::print
until after line breaking, but the tuplet bracket is drawn wrong anyway (I
added
\override
Issue 282: tuplet bracket printed over the wrong staff
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=282
New issue report by gpermus:
% the tuplet bracket for the bottom staff is printed over the top staff,
% but the tuplet number is printed correctly over the bottom staff.
\version
Ah, ok. I added the tuplet bracket problem as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=282
Please only report one issue per email. For the --png thing, what
operating system are you using?
Cheers,
- Graham
Jay Anderson wrote:
Hmm... I was using 2.11.15-1 on Fedora Core 6. With
Issue 282: tuplet bracket printed over the wrong staff
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=282
Comment #1 by gpermus:
Duplicate of issue 279, sorry.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Duplicate
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields
Issue 279: x-staff tuplets cause havoc
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=279
Comment #3 by hanwenn:
.14 also fails this, and I suspect it was broken all along.
The correct solution is to add
stem-gt;relative_coordinate(common_y, Y_AXIS)
to left amp; right Y coordinate.
Issue 283: bar numbers move vertically (and should not)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=283
New issue report by gpermus:
% collision avoidance problem? The quot;2quot; bar number is way too high.
\version quot;2.11.16quot;
\relative c'' {
c1
\break
c''1
}
Attachments:
15 matches
Mail list logo