Re: Missing number in broken triplet

2007-11-29 Thread Hans Aberg
I don't think so: In this new case, the triplets are treated as merely being time values (2/3 notes), which do not need to fill up the whole triplet value. It is thus possible to only have one 2/3 note standing alone, completed by additional 2/3 notes in other positions. Then one expect

Re: No Convert-ly Binaries

2007-11-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
There are no convert-ly binaries and have never been. However, it seems that the python binary is missing in the 2.11.35-2 package for Windows. The same or similar problem have already been reported for Linux. /Mats Joshua Koo wrote: Hi, I havent been using lilypond for some time, so I

Re: Missing number in broken triplet

2007-11-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Graham Percival wrote: Isn't this another case of http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405q=tuplet No, since it's about printing the number, not the bracket. There's a comment in lily/tuplet-number.cc about some rows of code that remove the number object if it doesn't span

oldaddlyrics

2007-11-29 Thread Rune Zedeler
converted a piece of music from 1.7.17 to 2.10.10 with convert-ly. Result contains a call to \oldaddlyrics. When running lilypond - either 2.10.33 or 2.11.34 - I get the error: cannot find music object: OldLyricCombineMusic \version 2.10.33 { \oldaddlyrics \context Staff = sa { c d e f }

\repeatTie tie direction in polyphonic systems

2007-11-29 Thread maestraccio
I'm not top posting. %% the \repeatTie command resets tie direction to \tieNeutral in polyphonic systems. \version 2.10.33 \paper{ ragged-right=##t } \relative c'' { { \repeat volta 2 {c1~} \alternative {{c4 b a g }{c4\repeatTie d c b }} } \\ { a1~|a4 g f e |a4\repeatTie b a g }

Re: key sig fouls slur

2007-11-29 Thread Graham Percival
Ok, entered as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=515 Cheers, -Graham David Bobroff wrote: Graham Percival wrote: There's a couple of ugly slur issues in the tracker. If you want me to add another, please submit a minimal example. I don't realistically expect anybody to

Issue 515 in lilypond: ugly slur (too flat)

2007-11-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 515: ugly slur (too flat) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=515 New issue report by gpermus: % this slur is too flat \version 2.11.35 \paper { ragged-right = ##t } \relative c' { \key f \major \time 2/4 f'2( bes4 f) } Issue attributes: Status: Accepted