There seems to be a typo in Snippets 2.11.39, pp. 21-22: There should
be an extra 2 between the two last 3s to get the 25/8 Sedi Donka
rhythm used there. (One way to remember it, is as a compound of 7 = 3
+2+2+ and 11=2+2+3+2+2.)
So on p. 21, it should be:
\override Staff.TimeSignature
2008/2/28 Hans Aberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There seems to be a typo in Snippets 2.11.39, pp. 21-22: There should
be an extra 2 between the two last 3s to get the 25/8 Sedi Donka
rhythm used there. (One way to remember it, is as a compound of 7 = 3
+2+2+ and 11=2+2+3+2+2.)
Oh yes! Thanks for
Are you sure that you understand how the compound-time Scheme function
works? The last parameter should be the denominator, i.e. 8.
When you included Hans' proposed change, the denominators end up
being 2 instead of 8. If I understand Hans correctly, there should be 11
terms
in the time
2008/2/28 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are you sure that you understand how the compound-time Scheme function
works? The last parameter should be the denominator, i.e. 8.
When you included Hans' proposed change, the denominators end up
being 2 instead of 8. If I understand Hans
On 28 Feb 2008, at 14:22, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Are you sure that you understand how the compound-time Scheme function
works?
No me either :-). Actually, I use:
barlines = { \repeat unfold 8 {s16*7 \bar : s16*7 \bar : s16*11
| } }
\score {
\new Staff
\barlines
\relative {
Valentin Villenave wrote:
It's a pity, however, that the number of args has to be hardcoded.
Would it be possible to write some universal compound-meter
function, where the numbers would be automatically taken into account
except the last number, which would be taken as denominator?
Of
Valentin Villenave skrev:
It's a pity, however, that the number of args has to be hardcoded.
Would it be possible to write some universal compound-meter
function, where the numbers would be automatically taken into account
except the last number, which would be taken as denominator?
Sure.
I
2008/2/28 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Of course, see http://www.federated.com/~jim/schintro-v14/schintro_68.html
for example!;-)
Wow! I didn't know this one; I have browsed a lot of links starting
from schemers.org, but never found something as pedagogically
phrased. Thanks :)
Valentin Villenave skrev:
Rune: what's wrong with loading markup.scm?
It is not loading the file that is the problem. It is the reason for me
having to load the file that is the problem.
I was unable to do the function without using functions that are not
meant to be accessible to the user.
