Issue 595 in lilypond: Inverted time signature fraction in warning message

2008-03-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 595: Inverted time signature fraction in warning message http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=595 New issue report by v.villenave: %The following piece of LilyPond code produces a misleading warning. \version "2.11.42" { \time 4/3 c } % warning: strange time sig

Re: misleading warning

2008-03-30 Thread Valentin Villenave
Thanks, added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=595 (I also made a patch to fix it) Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Weirdness in "varcoda" mf glyph

2008-03-30 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings, has anyone ever noticed this message when compiling? Internal Error in scripts.varcoda: couldn't find a needed exit from an intersection Internal Error: Could not find finalm Internal Error in scripts.varcoda: couldn't find a needed exit from an intersection There seems to be some kin

Re: Weirdness in "varcoda" mf glyph

2008-03-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Internal Error in scripts.varcoda: couldn't find a needed exit from an > intersection > Internal Error: > Could not find finalm > Internal Error in scripts.varcoda: couldn't find a needed exit from an > intersection This is a harmless message from fontforge. > There seems to be some kind of we

Re: Weirdness in "varcoda" mf glyph

2008-03-30 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/3/30, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, it isn't. It's a problem with fontforge's limited precision > during the removal of overlapping contours. If you compile a recent > version of fontforge with --enable-double, the messages vanish. Great! Thank you Werner. Cheers, Valentin

Issue 545 in lilypond: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista

2008-03-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 545: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545 Comment #4 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It would appear that the problem has been resolved with 2.11.43-2... Thank you! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or

Issue 545 in lilypond: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista

2008-03-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 545: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545 Comment #5 by hanwenn: (No comment was entered for this change.) Issue attribute updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_11_43 -- You received this message because you

Issue 588 in lilypond: Regression: LilyPond excessively slow on Windows XP

2008-03-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 588: Regression: LilyPond excessively slow on Windows XP http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=588 Comment #3 by v.villenave: Someone will have to explain me how to put links in tracker's comments... :) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC f

Issue 545 in lilypond: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista

2008-03-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 545: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545 Comment #6 by v.villenave: I cannot verify it myself, so I'll just trust in comment #4 and close the issue. Issue attribute updates: Status: Verified -- You received this m

regressions: part-combine-text.ly

2008-03-30 Thread Stan Sanderson
v2.11.43-2: regressions part-combine-text.ly issue: clarity current: "The new part combiner detects a2, solo1 and solo2, and prints i texts accordingly." (To what does "i" refer?) Stan ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://l

Re: regressions: part-combine-text.ly

2008-03-30 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
It's probably a stray thing I inserted when I wanted to start insert mode in Viper, but was already in that mode :-) 2008/3/30, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > v2.11.43-2: regressions part-combine-text.ly > > issue: clarity > > current: "The new part combiner detects a2, solo1 and solo2, a

Re:

2008-03-30 Thread Marcus Macauley
On 3/28/2008 5:38 AM, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, I can confirm the crash with version 2.10.33 in Linux. > Version 2.11 works well also with this example. > Time to upgrade? Evidently 2.11.43-2 does the trick. (2.11.43-1, on Windows XP, crashed after complaining about Pango