On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:25:34 + (UTC)
Stemby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you volunteering to work on Unfretted strings as part of GDP?
>
> :-) How can I help you? My english is terrible, but I'm violinist.
Take over responsibility for unfretted-strings.itely.
> > http://web.uvic.ca/~g
> Are you volunteering to work on Unfretted strings as part of GDP?
:-) How can I help you? My english is terrible, but I'm violinist.
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Wonderful... a real revolution.
Bye
Carlo
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lily
Stemby wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure that it is a bug.
Now I think it is a documentation "error":
Try looking in LSR. There's at least two examples of this in
there.
Exactly! :-) This[1] example could be put into the user manual, chapter 7.8
("Other instrument specific notat
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:30:58 + (UTC)
Stemby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try looking in LSR. There's at least two examples of this in
> > there.
>
> Exactly! :-) This[1] example could be put into the user manual,
> chapter 7.8 ("Other instrument specific notation").
Are you volunteering t
Hi
> > I'm not sure that it is a bug.
Now I think it is a documentation "error":
> Try looking in LSR. There's at least two examples of this in
> there.
Exactly! :-) This[1] example could be put into the user manual, chapter 7.8
("Other instrument specific notation").
Thank you.
Regards
Car
In my mind, it's not really a bug. Because of the way the automatic
instantiation of
contexts works, your code is equivalent to
\new Staff \relative c''
{
<<
\new Voice { c16 e a g f e d c }
\new Voice { s16( s) s-. s-. s( s) s-. s-. }
>>
}
which means that the placement of the articula
On 2008/06/19 00:38 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Le 19 juin 2008 00:20, Yohann Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > The problem is that the illustrating note is an E. The correct translation
> > would
> > be:
>
> Indeed! Thanks, someone will correct it pretty soon.
This is now fixed
