I forward this to the bug mailing list, since it's
yet another bug related to the bounding box of snippets!
/Mats
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eluze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Eluze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Issue 679: eps bounding box ignores extra-offset
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=679
New issue report by v.villenave:
% In the following snippet, the notehead with extra-offset is not printed.
% See attached picture.
\version "2.11.58"
fixA =
{
\once \override Stem #'
2008/9/17 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I forward this to the bug mailing list, since it's
> yet another bug related to the bounding box of snippets!
Thanks, added as
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
and
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=679
Cheers,
Valentin
___
Issue 657: Weird cross-staff beams damping when stems are down
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=657
Comment #1 by v.villenave:
A workaround is to set the concaveness property, as demonstrated on
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=508
--
You received this message because you
Issue 680: clusters collapse when applied to repeated chords
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=680
New issue report by v.villenave:
% In this example, the shape of the cluster spanner is irregular, and
% collapses in the middle of each measure. (This does not happen with
% stairs
Issue 681: ClusterSpanner style should be modifiable on-the-fly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=681
New issue report by v.villenave:
% In the following example, the modification of the ClusterSpanner's style
% is ignored; you need to start a new spanner if you want the new styl
Not a bug - extra-offset is designed to be ignored by lily in spacing
calculations, including the calcultaion of bbox sizes.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Issue 679: eps bounding box ignores extra-offset
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=679
>
>
Hi Karim,
Just to let you know, we've just changed the code for rationals so
they use 64 bits of precision rather than 32. This should hopefully
solve the problems you've been having. The new code will be in the
next development release, 2.11.59.
I've attached a re-run of your snippet using the
Issue 679: eps bounding box ignores extra-offset
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=679
Comment #1 by v.villenave:
This is actually what extra-offset is meant to do.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Invalid
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owne
