is \new Score really needed in the docs?

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings, I'm not sure we want to use \new Score at all. In some places it isn't required at all, in other places where it is used with \with{}, it could easily be replaced with \layout { \context { \Score }}}... http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=grep&s=\new+Sc

Issue 1031 in lilypond: constantly-changing regtest

2010-03-04 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Regression New issue 1031 by percival.music.ca: constantly-changing regtest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1031 The test input/regression/test-output-distance.ly changes every time. That's ok and good. It's su

Regtest: beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly doesn't look good

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings, the beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly regtest doesn't look good (there's a collision at the beginning). Does this deserve a place in the tracker? Cheers, Valentin <>___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l

Documented but unimplemented feature for beam subdivisions?

2010-03-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hi, According to the 2.13 docs, it should work to do something like \overrideBeamSettings #'Score #'(4 . 4) #'subdivide #'(((1 . 16) . (2 6 10 12))) to specify a pattern for beam subdivisions. However, when I tried it, nothing happened and as far as I can see from the implementation, all subdi

Doc build: wrong images in regtest webpage

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings, have a look at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html particularly collision-seconds.ly and color.ly: the wrong pictures are displayed (although the link is correct). Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing l

Re: Documented but unimplemented feature for beam subdivisions?

2010-03-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/4/10 8:09 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > Hi, > > According to the 2.13 docs, it should work to do something like > \overrideBeamSettings #'Score #'(4 . 4) #'subdivide #'(((1 . 16) . (2 6 > 10 12))) > to specify a pattern for beam subdivisions. However, when I tried it, > nothing happened

Re: Documented but unimplemented feature for beam subdivisions?

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > Unfortunately, that is correct. I had hoped to have 'subdivide implemented > by now, but it is not yet implemented.  I will fix the documentation. In that case, it might be a good idea to keep it warm in the tracker, marked as Started... (Unl

Reviewing regtests for undocumented stuff.

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings everybody, in case you might be interested, here's the Wiki page I've just opened: http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilyp

Re: Doc build: wrong images in regtest webpage

2010-03-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/3/4 Valentin Villenave : > Greetings, > > have a look at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html > > particularly collision-seconds.ly and color.ly: the wrong pictures are > displayed (although the link is correct). I see the correct images there. What's happenin

Re: Regtest: beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly doesn't look good

2010-03-04 Thread Graham Percival
What does this show that 37 doesn't? If you really want to do something, just add a comment to 37. Cheers, - Graham On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote: > Greetings, > > the beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly regtest doesn't look good (there's a > collision at the beginning). >

Re: Doc build: wrong images in regtest webpage

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: > I see the correct images there. What's happening? Indeed. Must have been a bug with my browser: after emptying the cache it didn't occur anymore. Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-l

Re: Regtest: beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly doesn't look good

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > What does this show that 37 doesn't?  If you really want to do > something, just add a comment to 37. Oh, I thought 37 had been fixed for ages. My bad. Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailin

Re: Doc build: wrong images in regtest webpage

2010-03-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/3/4 Valentin Villenave : > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: >> I see the correct images there. What's happening? > > Indeed. Must have been a bug with my browser: after emptying the cache > it didn't occur anymore. I can imagine lots of funny situations caused by that bu

Re: Doc build: wrong images in regtest webpage

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: > I can imagine lots of funny situations caused by that bug, you might > want to tell us which browser it is, so we can avoid to use it. :-) Some weird unknown experimental thingy called Firefox 3.6... No wonder it's unreliable, these guys don

Re: is \new Score really needed in the docs?

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Puttock
On 4 March 2010 11:04, Valentin Villenave wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm not sure we want to use \new Score at all. > In some places it isn't required at all, in other places where it is > used with \with{}, it could easily be replaced with \layout { \context > { \Score }}}... > http://git.savannah.g

Re: [frogs] Reviewing regtests for undocumented stuff.

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Puttock
On 4 March 2010 15:46, Valentin Villenave wrote: > Greetings everybody, > > in case you might be interested, here's the Wiki page I've just opened: > http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests Great! If I can work out how to post comments, I'll add a few replies. :) Cheers, Neil _

Re: Ties between measures not rendered in MIDI

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM, François Jortay wrote: > Thank you for this wonderful Lilypond ! By the way: if you speak French, you might be interested in subscribing to our French-speaking LilyPond mailing list: http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user-fr Cheers, V. Villenave. _

Issue 1032 in lilypond: Documentation: automatically-generated list of articulations

2010-03-04 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Medium Frog New issue 1032 by v.villenave: Documentation: automatically-generated list of articulations http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1032 So far our "List of articulations" (to be found on http://lilypond.o

Re: [frogs] Reviewing regtests for undocumented stuff.

2010-03-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > Great!  If I can work out how to post comments, I'll add a few replies. :) You can create an account, and edit the page and sign your comments with (IIRC). Feel free to give Patrick or me a ping, since we're both editors on the Wiki. So

Issue 1033 in lilypond: Documentation: \new Score must die

2010-03-04 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Medium Syntax New issue 1033 by v.villenave: Documentation: \new Score must die http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1033 Although officially discouraged, the \new Score syntax is still used in several places, particu

Re: Issue 1031 in lilypond: constantly-changing regtest

2010-03-04 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1031 by hanwenn: constantly-changing regtest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1031 the latter is a bug, but AFAIK, it is a regression. It would be good to know when this started. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC field

Re: Issue 838 in lilypond: Inconsistency in tests output size

2010-03-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:23 PM, wrote: > > Comment #8 on issue 838 by percival.music.ca: Inconsistency in tests output > size > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=838 > > That is so weird.  Do you have any clue why they put the >  (= (random 40) 1 > > in there? At some point we h