Greetings,
I'm not sure we want to use \new Score at all.
In some places it isn't required at all, in other places where it is
used with \with{}, it could easily be replaced with \layout { \context
{ \Score }}}...
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=grep&s=\new+Sc
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Regression
New issue 1031 by percival.music.ca: constantly-changing regtest
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1031
The test
input/regression/test-output-distance.ly
changes every time. That's ok and good. It's su
Greetings,
the beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly regtest doesn't look good (there's a
collision at the beginning).
Does this deserve a place in the tracker?
Cheers,
Valentin
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
Hi,
According to the 2.13 docs, it should work to do something like
\overrideBeamSettings #'Score #'(4 . 4) #'subdivide #'(((1 . 16) . (2 6
10 12)))
to specify a pattern for beam subdivisions. However, when I tried it,
nothing happened and as far as I can see from the implementation, all
subdi
Greetings,
have a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html
particularly collision-seconds.ly and color.ly: the wrong pictures are
displayed (although the link is correct).
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing l
On 3/4/10 8:09 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the 2.13 docs, it should work to do something like
> \overrideBeamSettings #'Score #'(4 . 4) #'subdivide #'(((1 . 16) . (2 6
> 10 12)))
> to specify a pattern for beam subdivisions. However, when I tried it,
> nothing happened
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Unfortunately, that is correct. I had hoped to have 'subdivide implemented
> by now, but it is not yet implemented. I will fix the documentation.
In that case, it might be a good idea to keep it warm in the tracker,
marked as Started... (Unl
Greetings everybody,
in case you might be interested, here's the Wiki page I've just opened:
http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilyp
2010/3/4 Valentin Villenave :
> Greetings,
>
> have a look at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html
>
> particularly collision-seconds.ly and color.ly: the wrong pictures are
> displayed (although the link is correct).
I see the correct images there. What's happenin
What does this show that 37 doesn't? If you really want to do
something, just add a comment to 37.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> the beam-multiple-cross-staff.ly regtest doesn't look good (there's a
> collision at the beginning).
>
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> I see the correct images there. What's happening?
Indeed. Must have been a bug with my browser: after emptying the cache
it didn't occur anymore.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-l
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What does this show that 37 doesn't? If you really want to do
> something, just add a comment to 37.
Oh, I thought 37 had been fixed for ages.
My bad.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailin
2010/3/4 Valentin Villenave :
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> I see the correct images there. What's happening?
>
> Indeed. Must have been a bug with my browser: after emptying the cache
> it didn't occur anymore.
I can imagine lots of funny situations caused by that bu
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> I can imagine lots of funny situations caused by that bug, you might
> want to tell us which browser it is, so we can avoid to use it. :-)
Some weird unknown experimental thingy called Firefox 3.6... No wonder
it's unreliable, these guys don
On 4 March 2010 11:04, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm not sure we want to use \new Score at all.
> In some places it isn't required at all, in other places where it is
> used with \with{}, it could easily be replaced with \layout { \context
> { \Score }}}...
> http://git.savannah.g
On 4 March 2010 15:46, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Greetings everybody,
>
> in case you might be interested, here's the Wiki page I've just opened:
> http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests
Great! If I can work out how to post comments, I'll add a few replies. :)
Cheers,
Neil
_
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM, François Jortay wrote:
> Thank you for this wonderful Lilypond !
By the way: if you speak French, you might be interested in
subscribing to our French-speaking LilyPond mailing list:
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user-fr
Cheers,
V. Villenave.
_
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Medium Frog
New issue 1032 by v.villenave: Documentation: automatically-generated list
of articulations
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1032
So far our "List of articulations" (to be found on
http://lilypond.o
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Great! If I can work out how to post comments, I'll add a few replies. :)
You can create an account, and edit the page and sign your comments
with (IIRC). Feel free to give Patrick or me a ping, since we're
both editors on the Wiki.
So
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Medium Syntax
New issue 1033 by v.villenave: Documentation: \new Score must die
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1033
Although officially discouraged, the \new Score syntax is still used in
several places, particu
Comment #1 on issue 1031 by hanwenn: constantly-changing regtest
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1031
the latter is a bug, but AFAIK, it is a regression.
It would be good to know when this started.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC field
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:23 PM, wrote:
>
> Comment #8 on issue 838 by percival.music.ca: Inconsistency in tests output
> size
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=838
>
> That is so weird. Do you have any clue why they put the
> (= (random 40) 1
>
> in there?
At some point we h
22 matches
Mail list logo