Failure to install (or find) the LILYPOND software with UBUNTU

2010-05-09 Thread Oliver Penrose
Please explain to me how to install the LILYPOND program on my X22 laptop, which is using UBUNTU. So far I have not got anywhere, trying to follow the instructions on your web site(s) I went to the web site http://lilypond.org/web/install/ which says When we have whetted your appetite for

Re: Issue 1040 in lilypond: regtest for changing file names

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1040 by v.villenave: regtest for changing file names http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1040 Perhaps this could also allow us to have a regtest for the relative includes feature: see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-03/msg00272.html

Re: Failure to install (or find) the LILYPOND software with UBUNTU

2010-05-09 Thread Henning Plumeyer
Am 09.05.2010, 13:01 Uhr, schrieb Oliver Penrose oli...@ma.hw.ac.uk: About 5 lines down, there is a Ubuntu symbol and to the right of that it says included with distribution Lilypond is not installed in Ubuntu by default. You can use the Synaptic Package Manager to install it.

Issue 1078 in lilypond: relative includes should also work in Scheme expressions

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 1078 by v.villenave: relative includes should also work in Scheme expressions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1078 A convenient (albeit hackish) way to include .ly files through scheme is to parse

Re: Issue 602 in lilypond: Feature request: better support for Sacred Harp notation

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #37 on issue 602 by v.villenave: Feature request: better support for Sacred Harp notation http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=602 Indeed. I got confused with issue 1060 and kept grepping for Funk, funkHeads and whatnot. Closing.

Re: Failure to install (or find) the LILYPOND software with UBUNTU

2010-05-09 Thread Boris Shingarov
On Sun, 9 May 2010 11:01:28 (UTC), Oliver Penrose wrote: Please explain to me how to install the LILYPOND program on my X22 laptop, which is using UBUNTU.   Hi Oliver,   This question is best to ask on the lilypond-user list, not the bug list; but here is an answer for you anyway:  

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 963 by v.villenave: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 This may not be the most appropriate place to discuss that, but do we still want to ship Python 2.4 with the mingw LilyPond build? (I personally don't care what

Re: Issue 1073 in lilypond: convert-ly and accented characters

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Frog Comment #1 on issue 1073 by v.villenave: convert-ly and accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1073 Looks like a job for a Frog to me. (I have somehow given up with it.) ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 355 in lilypond: \repeat bar lines get messed up

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 355 by n.puttock: \repeat bar lines get messed up http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=355 There's no way \partial will be made smarter since it's just a context property override (and it's not part of the bug here anyway). I don't think we should recommend

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 postfix \cresc should be documented elsewhere than the regtests. ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1066 in lilypond: postfix \cresc

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: postfix \cresc Labels: -Type-Documentation Type-Enhancement Comment #4 on issue 1066 by percival.music.ca: postfix \cresc http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1066 Verified means nobody should ever need to look at this item again. I've added a

Re: Issue 1072 in lilypond: PATCH: Doc: Clarify \relative inside \repeat issue.

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1072 by n.puttock: PATCH: Doc: Clarify \relative inside \repeat issue. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1072 Where are you looking? Looks fine here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/long-repeats#Long-repeats

Issue 1079 in lilypond: upgrade python in GUB

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Build Priority-Low New issue 1079 by percival.music.ca: upgrade python in GUB http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1079 Comment #12 from issue 963: This may not be the most appropriate place to discuss that, but do we still want to ship

Re: Issue 1072 in lilypond: PATCH: Doc: Clarify \relative inside \repeat issue.

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #5 on issue 1072 by v.villenave: PATCH: Doc: Clarify \relative inside \repeat issue. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1072 Oh, I was looking for the Long repeats and relative mode from Mark's first patch. OK, it is indeed

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #13 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 GUB has built most of the architectures (it's on linux-pcc right now); if these were going to cause problems, it would have happened by now. For the

Re: Issue 75 in lilypond: Slurs cannot be nested

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 75 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Slurs cannot be nested http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=75 While the summary may be a more accurate statement of the reason behind the deficiency, I don't think it's as helpful for a user who is having the problem. I think we

Re: Issue 75 in lilypond: Slurs cannot be nested (including acciaccatura and appoggiatura)

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: Slurs cannot be nested (including acciaccatura and appoggiatura) Comment #10 on issue 75 by percival.music.ca: Slurs cannot be nested (including acciaccatura and appoggiatura) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=75 Well, despite the remarks on our

Re: Failure to install (or find) the LILYPOND software with UBUNTU

2010-05-09 Thread Bernard Hurley
In synaptic make sure the universe repository is selected (you can do this from Settings-Repositories). Then reload the package information, select lilypond and install it. Alternatively if you already know this repository is activated, you can simply open a terminal and type: sudo

Re: Failure to install (or find) the LILYPOND software with UBUNTU

2010-05-09 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/5/9 Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz: In synaptic make sure the universe repository is selected (you can do this from Settings-Repositories). Then reload the package information, select lilypond and install it. Alternatively if you already know this repository is activated, you can

Re: Issue 1036 in lilypond: Links to accented anchors

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1036 by paconet.org: Links to accented anchors http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1036 This info is a memo for a complete novice like me trying to figure out the origin of the problem: I am looking at out-website/web.es.xref-map and I think all three

Issue 1080 in lilypond: Regression: bar lines in double bar are positioned too close together

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression New issue 1080 by pnorcks: Regression: bar lines in double bar are positioned too close together http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1080 This is a regression between 2.13.17 and 2.13.18. See the

Issue 1081 in lilypond: Problem with xrefs to @unnumbered*

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Build Priority-Medium New issue 1081 by pnorcks: Problem with xrefs to @unnumbered* http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1081 Copied from: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-04/msg00503.html I've noticed that

Re: xref to @unnumbered* bug

2010-05-09 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: I'm not certain it's a texi2html bug, or a bug in our texi2html init file, but either way it should be in the tracker. Bug Squad: please add this.  Type-build, priority-medium. Added as:

Issue 1082 in lilypond: Completion_heads_engraver misbehaves in multi-staff case

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 1082 by pnorcks: Completion_heads_engraver misbehaves in multi-staff case http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1082 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-05/msg4.html %%% BEGIN %%%

Re: completion disturbed by other staff

2010-05-09 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, PálBenkő benko@gmail.com wrote: \version 2.12.3  \new Staff  {    b2 b b b b b  }  \new Staff  {    b4 b\breve b2.  } \layout {  \context  {    \Voice    \remove Note_heads_engraver    \consists Completion_heads_engraver  } } Thanks.