Re: Issue 809 in lilypond: Support for older MS systems is broken

Comment #3 on issue 809 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Support for older MS systems is broken http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=809 Here's the patch to remove NT and ME. I will try to test Windows 2000 - but I only have 'Advanced Server' rather than any of the 'desktop' editions.

Re: Issue 1147 in lilypond: Typo in documentation link for 2.13

Comment #3 on issue 1147 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Typo in documentation link for 2.13 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1147 Patch attached. James Attachments: 0001-Web-Fix-Typo-Issue-1147.patch 942 bytes ___ bug-lilypo

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1123 Comment #5 on issue 1146 by brownian.box: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 If You believe it's a duplicate --- mark it as such. I do believe, so i'll mark i

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #8 on issue 1123 by brownian.box: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 Issue 1146 has been merged into this issue. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Comment #4 on issue 1146 by RalphBugList: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 So, should I (or someone else) kill this issue? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.o

Re: Issue 1147 in lilypond: Typo in documentation link for 2.13

Comment #2 on issue 1147 by RalphBugList: Typo in documentation link for 2.13 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1147 Done. Thanks, Graham. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/b

Re: Issue 1148 in lilypond: makelsr should look for local convert-ly

Comment #2 on issue 1148 by frederic...@m4x.org: makelsr should look for local convert-ly http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1148 That's for me, of course! Fred ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

Re: Issue 1147 in lilypond: Typo in documentation link for 2.13

Comment #1 on issue 1147 by percival.music.ca: Typo in documentation link for 2.13 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1147 Excellent! Have you sent an email to the initial reporter, CC'd to the bug-lilypond list, telling him that it's been added to the tracker? Those emai

Re: Issue 1148 in lilypond: makelsr should look for local convert-ly

Comment #1 on issue 1148 by percival.music.ca: makelsr should look for local convert-ly http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1148 Frog: 5 minutes, assuming familiarity with python. Most of that time is for testing, not actual programming. I think it's only a 2-line patch to

Issue 1148 in lilypond: makelsr should look for local convert-ly

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Scripts Priority-Medium Maintainability New issue 1148 by percival.music.ca: makelsr should look for local convert-ly http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1148 makelsr.py only looks for convert-ly in the global path; it would be nice i

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

On Wed 23 Jun 2010, 15:42 Xavier Scheuer wrote: > 2010/6/23 : > > > Comment #2 on issue 1146 by brownian.box: Time signature problem > > in example for large projects > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 > > > > Isn't it a duplicate of issue 1123? I believe it is. > > Sorry

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

2010/6/23 : > Comment #2 on issue 1146 by brownian.box: Time signature problem > in example for large projects > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 > > Isn't it a duplicate of issue 1123? I believe it is. Sorry, I replied in the same time as Dmytro and I didn't know it. (and

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Comment #3 on issue 1146 by x.scheuer: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 It is due to Jan's recent bump of fontforge for woff fonts, like issue 1123, isn't it? ___ bug-l

Issue 1147 in lilypond: Typo in documentation link for 2.13

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Low New issue 1147 by RalphBugList: Typo in documentation link for 2.13 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1147 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/bug-reports domain in email address for bug-lilypond s

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Comment #2 on issue 1146 by brownian.box: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 Isn't it a duplicate of issue 1123? I believe it is. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@

Re: buggy image in documentation?

Marek Klein wrote : Hi, there seems to be problem with time signature in example for large projects: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/examples particularly: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/ly-examples/orchestra.png __ I can't see the .ly file to tell if th

Re: Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Updates: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Medium Comment #1 on issue 1146 by RalphBugList: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 I can't easily access the .ly file for the .png, so I can't tell if it can be re

Issue 1146 in lilypond: Time signature problem in example for large projects

Status: Accepted Owner: New issue 1146 by RalphBugList: Time signature problem in example for large projects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1146 problem with time signature in example for large projects: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/ly-examples/orch

Re: q notation for repeated chords should also copy \harmonic...?

Arno, I'll take a look and see Hello, On 22/06/2010 23:44, Arno Waschk wrote: ... not obvious as in i can't find it, and i was starting to search it in the chords section I am using the notation reference (my version is 2.13.24 but it has been in the reference for a while). Look for

Issue 1145 in lilypond: Enhancement: promote 'use-breve-rest from internal to user-settable

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low New issue 1145 by brownian.box: Enhancement: promote 'use-breve-rest from internal to user-settable http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1145 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-12/msg4.html

Re: Issue 1014 in lilypond: Full/multi measure rests should be semibreve (for any but 4/2)

Comment #1 on issue 1014 by brownian.box: Full/multi measure rests should be semibreve (for any but 4/2) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1014 For the record: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-de...@gnu.org/msg18832.html ___ b

Issue 1144 in lilypond: [PATCH] 100+ warnings (issue1724041)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch New issue 1144 by neziap: [PATCH] 100+ warnings (issue1724041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1144 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-06/msg00348.html ___

Re: Issue 684 in lilypond: Enhancement: MetronomeMark should support break-align-symbols

Updates: Labels: Patch Comment #21 on issue 684 by neziap: Enhancement: MetronomeMark should support break-align-symbols http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=684 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond mail

Issue 1143 in lilypond: [PATCH]New patch for waveforms

Status: New Owner: Labels: Patch New issue 1143 by neziap: [PATCH]New patch for waveforms http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1143 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-06/msg00107.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-06/msg00120.html _