Re: desired behaviour

2011-01-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:29:23PM -0800, Keith OHara wrote: > In addition to showing images of desired behavior, people sometimes describe > it in text. Werner and some others report bugs in the form of a statement of > desired behavior and then a tiny example to show what they don't like. The

Re: desired behaviour

2011-01-11 Thread Keith OHara
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:19:04 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: To be clear, you're suggesting that we remove the octavation example and use this instead? Yes. I'm not entirely sold on this particular example -- it doesn't follow our input syntax style, and if we add all the line breaks that wou

Re: desired behaviour

2011-01-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Keith OHara wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:19:04 -0800, Graham Percival > wrote: > >Can you (or anybody > >else) create a different example, or modify the existing one? > > I was thinking of one real bug that was re-reported last week, which can be > e

Re: Fw: collision between MMR and key signature

2011-01-11 Thread Neil Puttock
On 10 January 2011 20:29, Keith OHara wrote: > It looks like all other items that needed it got an extra-spacing-height. >  I'm unclear on the zero-height-skyline concept, though, > and worry that typically end-of-line items like KeyCancellation might need > an extra-spacing-height for some reaso

Re: Issue 1290 in lilypond: Skyline compaction is going overboard sometimes

2011-01-11 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch fixed_2_13_46 Comment #11 on issue 1290 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Skyline compaction is going overboard sometimes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1290 Fixed, with commit e0249b3f7eba24ce0f911dfb1c97e70da6a8021c Regression tes

Issue 1471 in lilypond: accidentals after a clef change are not printed

2011-01-11 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 1471 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: accidentals after a clef change are not printed http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1471 Accidentals after a clef change are not printed and should be. \version "2.12.3"

Re: desired behaviour

2011-01-11 Thread Keith OHara
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:26:08 -0800, Graham Percival wrote:> % Accidentals should be printed for only the first note in a tie \version "2.10.1" \relative c'' { bes1 ~ | bes1 } What about using this one? It's even shorter, it captures the essence, and seems ideal. (personally I'd remove