Re: Issue 697 in lilypond: Path problem on Windows

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 697 by paconet@gmail.com: Path problem on Windows http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=697 This issue is fixed and verified. You should have previously reported the bug on the bug list. There, the team would ask you for more info such as exact

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/12 Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr: make translation-status ... Traceback (most recent call last):  File /home/jcharles/GIT/Traduc/scripts/auxiliar/translations-status.py, line 727, inmodule    updated = markup.paragraph (markup.emph (translation[l] (last_updated_string)

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: This diff can temporarily make 'make translation-status' to succeed, without the last-updated string whose generation fails. I resend as an attachment. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com diff --git

Re: Issue 1510 in lilypond: DOC: add explanation of -dlinclude-settings cmd line option

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_13_51 Comment #4 on issue 1510 by tdaniels...@googlemail.com: DOC: add explanation of -dlinclude-settings cmd line option http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1510 Pushed 16 Feb 11

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: I have discovered that  translation[l] (last_updated_string) does not contain the %s format placeholder for l=zh I looks as an easy fix from here. Stay tuned. Fixed in git, I hope. Still testing the build. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: 2011/2/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: This diff can temporarily make 'make translation-status' to succeed, without the last-updated string whose generation fails. I resend as an attachment. I have discovered that translation[l]

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: Fixed in git, I hope. Still testing the build. BTW does LANG=whatever date -u work for you? for whatever = fr, de etc? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___

Issue 1519 in lilypond: StaffGrouper properties does not apply to second level StaffGroup

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1519 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: StaffGrouper properties does not apply to second level StaffGroup http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1519 %% Reported on LilyPond French Users mailing list %%

Re: StaffGrouper properties does not apply to second level StaffGroup

2011-02-16 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote: %% Reported on LilyPond French Users mailing list %% http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Arrangement-vertical-encore-une-petite-amelioration-tp5982503p5998593.html %% %% StaffGrouper properties does not

Re: alpha test, horizontal spacing

2011-02-16 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/2/12 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk: Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than the one marked in red in the

Re: Issue 1504 in lilypond: Feathered beams reset at line break

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1504 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Feathered beams reset at line break http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1504 An update from Mike Soloman: \paper { ragged-right = ##t } \new Staff { \relative c' { \cadenzaOn \override Beam #'breakable = ##t \override

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 16/02/2011 13:19, Francisco Vila disait : 2011/2/16 Francisco Vilapaconet@gmail.com: Fixed in git, I hope. Still testing the build. OK succeeds here as well. Thanks for the chase! BTW does LANG=whatever date -u work for you? for whatever = fr, de etc? [jcharles@localhost

Re: make translation-status fails

2011-02-16 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 16/02/2011 13:19, Francisco Vila disait : 2011/2/16 Francisco Vilapaconet@gmail.com: BTW does LANG=whatever date -u work for you? for whatever = fr, de etc? [jcharles@localhost ~]$ LANG=de_DE.utf8 date -u Mi 16. Feb 18:52:37 UTC 2011 [jcharles@localhost ~]$ LANG=de date -u Wed Feb

Re: Issue 1294 in lilypond: Version 2.13.35 does not properly represent lyric tie

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #22 on issue 1294 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Version 2.13.35 does not properly represent lyric tie http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294 Verified with 2.13.51 under Linux and 2.13.44 under Windows.

Re: Issue 1469 in lilypond: broken link in CG

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #3 on issue 1469 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: broken link in CG http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1469 Link points to a page of results. I'm sorely tempted . . . ___ bug-lilypond mailing list

Re: Issue 1481 in lilypond: key cancellations at key changes are not complete when using extraNatural = ##f

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #5 on issue 1481 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: key cancellations at key changes are not complete when using extraNatural = ##f http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1481 Verified on Linux with LilyPond 2.13.51

Re: Issue 1205 in lilypond: Enhancement request: Repeating \tempo marks should be displayable in a controllable way

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #7 on issue 1205 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement request: Repeating \tempo marks should be displayable in a controllable way http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1205 Verified version 2.13.51 on Linux

Re: Issue 1426 in lilypond: [PATCH]Better support for beat slashes (multi-slash mixed duration). (issue212048)

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #4 on issue 1426 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: [PATCH]Better support for beat slashes (multi-slash mixed duration). (issue212048) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1426 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 572 in lilypond: Feature request: vertical instrumentName alignment should ignore non-stafflike contexts

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #4 on issue 572 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Feature request: vertical instrumentName alignment should ignore non-stafflike contexts http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=572 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 1229 in lilypond: Notes on ledger lines with stems pointed away from the staff overlap clef and staff ends in tight layouts

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #14 on issue 1229 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Notes on ledger lines with stems pointed away from the staff overlap clef and staff ends in tight layouts http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1229 The situation in the upper line of the last comment, with the bar extended

Re: Issue 1349 in lilypond: Lily.scm loads scm files so that macros are first used before they are defined, this worked in V1.8 but causes an error in V1.9/2.0

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Owner: pnorcks Cc: -pnorcks -n.puttock -Carl.D.Sorensen -hanwenn Comment #3 on issue 1349 by pnorcks: Lily.scm loads scm files so that macros are first used before they are defined, this worked in V1.8 but causes an error in V1.9/2.0

Re: Issue 1349 in lilypond: Guile 2.0 compat: Scheme macros must be defined/autocompiled before they are used.

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: Guile 2.0 compat: Scheme macros must be defined/autocompiled before they are used. Comment #4 on issue 1349 by pnorcks: Guile 2.0 compat: Scheme macros must be defined/autocompiled before they are used. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1349 (No comment

Re: Issue 1055 in lilypond: guile 2.0

2011-02-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #22 on issue 1055 by pnorcks: guile 2.0 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1055 Ian had some responses from the Guile developers a while back. See these threads: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2010-11/msg00037.html