Le 01/04/2012 00:23, Colin Hall disait :
On Mar 31, 2012 at 07:47PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
[...]
My questioning is: Why a same macro could behave differently when
in LM or in NR, and why, though they look identical do they work
differently according to the target manual?
Hi
Hi, All -
I will be out of town and out of touch on Monday, April 9. Can someone
please cover for me?
I appreciate your time and help,
Ralph
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Ralph Palmer ralphbugl...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAHr6eSpqtmwStwqj2K5R5_nwwk=zuxfs9sahil8r-3da+cb...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi, All -
I will be out of town and out of touch on Monday, April 9. Can someone
please cover for me?
I appreciate your time and help,
Ralph
I'm on holiday. I'll
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 09:58:08PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Ralph Palmer ralphbugl...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAHr6eSpqtmwStwqj2K5R5_nwwk=zuxfs9sahil8r-3da+cb...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi, All -
I will be out of town and out of touch on Monday, April 9. Can someone
please cover for
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:35:15AM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 01/04/2012 00:23, Colin Hall disait :
On Mar 31, 2012 at 07:47PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
[...]
My questioning is: Why a same macro could behave differently when
in LM or in NR, and why, though they look
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
scaling results in disappearance of the standard paper sizes which
now get only mentioned in an appendix.
This appendix needs a @ref (will be there in
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:40:34PM -0700, Joe Neeman wrote:
Consider the following lilypond-book output (version 2.14.2):
lilypond-book --pdf --latex-program=xelatex -o out miriam.lytex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond)