David Kastrup wrote
Phil Holmes lt;
mail@
gt; writes:
Eluze lt;
eluzew@
gt; wrote in message
news:
1348959173728-133838.post@.nabble
...
it's a shame - the LSR still works with an old stable version
(actual stable
is 2.16.0, LSR is 2.14.2)
this means
- new snippets using
On 09/30/2012 02:39 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
URL:http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/1047693
AFAICS Ubuntu just imports whatever's in Debian Sid at the time they make their
6-monthly fork.
In principle they can pull in an updated package from Debian (they've done this
On 09/30/2012 02:39 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
URL:http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/1047693
Regarding Ubuntu, has anybody been contacted about this bug?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/1021570
There's also this (quite old) not-quite-bug, which might
Looking at the Ubuntu/Launchpad bug list for Lilypond makes me wonder -- is
there any mechanism in place to ensure Lilypond developers receive bug reports
placed in distros' bugtrackers?
If not, perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
distros (Debian, Ubuntu,
Hello,
On 2 October 2012 17:08, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 09/30/2012 02:39 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
URL:http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/1047693
Regarding Ubuntu, has anybody been contacted about this bug?
Hello,
On 2 October 2012 17:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 10/02/2012 06:21 PM, James wrote:
So without the snippet log I cannot really tell, but it doesn't look
that clean to start with. Maybe someone else can care comment?
Do you have any remarks on
On 10/02/2012 06:40 PM, James wrote:
Well unless they are using 1GB of RAM, I personally have not had any
problems with 2GB or RAM. So I'd find it hard to believe it was RAM.
AFAICS they're not building it on local machines but on automated server
systems, possibly on cloud-based virtual
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team at least
gets alerted to the issues out there?
sounds like +1
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Janek Warcho wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team
On 10/02/2012 11:51 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
bugs-lilypond is for receiving reports against the code we release.
Can you suggest a viable alternative to ensure that the development team receive
notice of downstream bug reports?
___
bug-lilypond
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:18:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Looking at the Ubuntu/Launchpad bug list for Lilypond makes me
wonder -- is there any mechanism in place to ensure Lilypond
developers receive bug reports placed in distros' bugtrackers?
No.
If not, perhaps it's worth
11 matches
Mail list logo
