Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

Hello Urs, 2013/6/18 Urs Liska > Nobody bothering accepting or at lest commenting a free patch contribution? > ___ > -- Marek Klein http://gregoriana.sk Gregoriana on youtube _

convert-ly produces invalid output for KeySignature.c0-position

Hello! I'm using the current lilypond from git. This is what I have before the conversion: \version "2.16.0" { \override KeySignature #'c0-position = #6 } convert-ly turns it into: \version "2.17.20" { \override KeySignature.c0-position = #6 } The original file can be processed by lil

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure.html is sligh

Re: Patch:Doc-enhancement identifiers

Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, as discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-06/msg00342.html The definition of identifier names in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure.html is slightly misleading. I think applying the

Re: If incipit has soprano clef, its staves are not aligned with main score

ArnoldTheresius writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> ... >> I am not overly enthused about downing extents for the purpose of >> getting baselines heeded. It's not really intuitive. > > Just an idea: a markup command which evaluates the Y-extent of its argument, > and returns it symetrically expande

Re: If incipit has soprano clef, its staves are not aligned with main score

David Kastrup wrote > ... > I am not overly enthused about downing extents for the purpose of > getting baselines heeded. It's not really intuitive. > > -- > David Kastrup > > > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@ > https://lists.gnu.or