http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document.html
Below the Input section there is:
Documents for \verb+lilypond-book+ may freely mix music and text.
\verb+ is intended? It's inside a verbatim block...
___
bu
Simon
On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
if both an AccidentalSuggestion and a slur are attached to a note,
LilyPond places both as expected, but issues a warning about
avoid-slur not being defined for AccidentalSuggestion. The appropriate
solution would probably be to just inse
Federico Bruni wrote Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:45 AM
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document.html
>
> Below the Input section there is:
>
> Documents for \verb+lilypond-book+ may freely mix music and text.
>
> \verb+ is intended? It's insi
Federico Bruni writes:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document.html
>
> Below the Input section there is:
>
> Documents for \verb+lilypond-book+ may freely mix music and text.
>
> \verb+ is intended? It's inside a verbatim block...
The verbatim
Hello,
Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb James:
Simon
On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
if both an AccidentalSuggestion and a slur are attached to a note,
LilyPond places both as expected, but issues a warning about
avoid-slur not being defined for AccidentalSuggestion. The
approp
2013/12/15 Simon Albrecht
> Hello,
>
> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb James:
>
> Simon
>>
>> On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> if both an AccidentalSuggestion and a slur are attached to a note,
>>> LilyPond places both as expected, but issues a warning about avoid-slur
Federico Bruni" wrote in message
news:capjdbpqlx7_xtu8bjxambo5msc7jesevzffcdf9emzpm7_x...@mail.gmail.com...
2013/12/15 Simon Albrecht
Hello,
Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb James:
Simon
On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
if both an AccidentalSuggestion and a slur are attache
On 15/12/13 12:39, Phil Holmes wrote:
Federico Bruni" wrote in message
news:capjdbpqlx7_xtu8bjxambo5msc7jesevzffcdf9emzpm7_x...@mail.gmail.com...
2013/12/15 Simon Albrecht
Hello,
Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb James:
Simon
On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
if both an Acci
Arjen Bax wrote Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:48 PM
> Complete minimal working example, omitting the lower staff:
>
> \version "2.16.2"
>
> sopTxt = \new Lyrics = sopL \with { alignAboveContext = "upper" }
>\lyricsto sop \lyricmode { A C }
>
> sopV = \relative c'' { << { c2 c } { \sopTxt
karol reports in
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/still-no-ultimate-way-to-create-three-staff-piano-layout-td153648.html
how all attempts to control the distance between two staff groups fail when
\removeEmptyStaves is involved.
I also observed that the staffgroup-staff-spacing of an upper le
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The key change in the upper staff can be properly aligned (after the "g") if
> I use \bar '' '' and \break. This disrupts Lilypond's auto-spacing.
>
>
>
> Is another solution possible?
I don't see an obvious solution (but then I don't understand
11 matches
Mail list logo