Re: Retrieving information about breaks

2015-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
Urs, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks, that works great. > It did *not* write to a file, but that's not the issue here. > The main point is that it listens to implicit break events. > The only time it doesn't write to a file for me is when I don't save

Re: Retrieving information about breaks

2015-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Hi David, thanks, that works great. It did *not* write to a file, but that's not the issue here. The main point is that it listens to implicit break events. Probably the page breaks are even irrelevant for my case: finding a way to recompile individual systems. what it doesn't do yet is handl

Re: Retrieving information about breaks (was: Partial compilation (again))

2015-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Urs, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Picking up that old thread seems better than starting a new one ... > > By now I've reached a different state and would like to come back to this > issue with a very concrete question: > Is it possible to determine at which positions (i

Retrieving information about breaks (was: Partial compilation (again))

2015-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Picking up that old thread seems better than starting a new one ... By now I've reached a different state and would like to come back to this issue with a very concrete question: Is it possible to determine at which positions (in terms of barnumber and measure-position) the final line breaks, p

Re: wish: ly:cheapest-breaking (or whatever name)

2015-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Ralph Palmer: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Urs Liska > wrote: Hi list, following up on a thread that I started some time ago (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-11/msg00139.html) I'd like to draw

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2015-01-23 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > FYI, Fedora has reverted the urw-fonts change, but this is still something > to consider fixing, as the change will need to be made eventually, and on > multiple distributions. > Jon and Werner and List - Just so this doesn't get lost in the

Re: wish: ly:cheapest-breaking (or whatever name)

2015-01-23 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi list, > > following up on a thread that I started some time ago ( > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-11/msg00139.html) > I'd like to draw the conclusions from that and ask for an additional > breaking "algorithm". > Hi,