Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-19 Thread David Kastrup
Masamichi Hosoda writes: >> Please submit git-formatted patches (including commit message) if >> possible. >> >> I pushed a fix to staging but could not make use of your patch. > > I'll try it in this weekend. > Please wait few days. No need to wait: as I said, I already pushed the fix myself.

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-19 Thread Masamichi Hosoda
> Please submit git-formatted patches (including commit message) if > possible. > > I pushed a fix to staging but could not make use of your patch. I'll try it in this weekend. Please wait few days. > Are you actually working on GUB currently? We are obviously having some > problems getting 2.19

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-19 Thread David Kastrup
Masamichi Hosoda writes: > Hi > > In lilypond current master branch, I found that > input/regression/time-signature-numbered.ly > and > input/regression/time-signature-single-digit.ly > files don't have ``\version''. > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/? > p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=8298bc0

time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-19 Thread Masamichi Hosoda
Hi In lilypond current master branch, I found that input/regression/time-signature-numbered.ly and input/regression/time-signature-single-digit.ly files don't have ``\version''. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/? p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=8298bc08d2d6398af3b1c988b825ad36d355e7ee Then, GUB'

Re: \tweak fails on MultiMeasureRests

2015-02-19 Thread James
On 18/02/15 17:27, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, it seems that the \tweak command does not have any effect on multi measure rests, neither with nor without specifying the grob: \version "2.19.8" { \tweak MultiMeasureRest.color #red R1 \tweak color #red R1 } I couldn't find an entry in