Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

2015-03-24 17:06 GMT+01:00 Mark Knoop : > At 15:43 on 24 Mar 2015, Kevin Barry wrote: >>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: >> >>> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'1 c'4 } % 3 bars, 2nd of which is empty >>> >>> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'2 c'4 } % 2 bars, neither of which is empty >>> >> >>At best I would

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

At 12:31 on 24 Mar 2015, Kevin Barry wrote: >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Mark Knoop wrote: At 18:16 on 23 Mar 2015, Mark Knoop wrote: >>>Barlines disappear when skipBars is true and a note duration >>>continues over the bar. I don't think this should happen. >>> >>>\version "2.18.2" >>> >

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

At 15:43 on 24 Mar 2015, Kevin Barry wrote: >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: > >> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'1 c'4 } % 3 bars, 2nd of which is empty >> >> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'2 c'4 } % 2 bars, neither of which is empty >> > >At best I would consider these to be non-standard notation. At wo

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: > { \time 2/4 c'4 c'1 c'4 } % 3 bars, 2nd of which is empty > > { \time 2/4 c'4 c'2 c'4 } % 2 bars, neither of which is empty > At best I would consider these to be non-standard notation. At worst I'd say it's incorrect. It's possible to write a

Re: Implementation of \tuplet allow both incorrect and correct musical expressions

Hello Ralph, you’ll be interested in reading . Indeed, the behaviour you describe is intentional in that Lily holds the user responsible to write sensible tuplet code, since there are different conventions, not only the one you d

[LSR] Displaying the exact extent of a system

>I'm not top posting Hi Bug Squad, About this snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=257 It shows a pretty old setting : \unset Staff.minimumVerticalExtent 1. AFAIK, it should have been replaced by \revert VerticalAxisGroup.minimum-Y-extent and/but is no more used since v2.13, shouldn't it?

Re: Implementation of \tuplet allow both incorrect and correct musical expressions

Ralph D. Jeffords writes: >> I'm not top posting. > > %{ MAJOR ERROR in implementation of Tuple: > > The tuple construct allows not only correct expressions but a multitude of > incorrect expressions for the same musical construction. "1st Test" shows 5 > different expressions that give the