tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not necessarily against it being called StaffAxis, but I wonder
if something like MixedStaff is more appropriate? Just thinking out
loud. I love this idea, btw.
StaffAxis is as appropriate as it gets. MixedStaff, however, might
be more
Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de writes:
Am 26.08.2015 um 18:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
New issue 4577
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not necessarily against it being called StaffAxis, but I wonder
if something like MixedStaff is more appropriate? Just thinking out
loud. I love this idea, btw.
StaffAxis
Am 26.08.2015 um 18:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
New issue 4577
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for
This is a nice addition! I'm not opposed to StaffAxis either, but here's
another suggestion to consider: StaffRow.
-Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not necessarily against it being called StaffAxis, but I wonder
if something like MixedStaff is more appropriate? Just thinking out
loud. I love this idea, btw.
StaffAxis is as appropriate as it gets.
I'm not necessarily against it being called StaffAxis, but I wonder if
something like MixedStaff is more appropriate? Just thinking out loud.
I love this idea, btw.
- Abraham
On 8/26/2015 10:52 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
New issue
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis
New issue
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for more info.
--
David Kastrup
On 8/26/2015 4:23 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
tisimst [hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=180227i=0 writes:
On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
David Kastrup [hidden email]
Perhaps OneStaff?
\oneVoice _is_ sort of the name for not
On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
tisimst [hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=180230i=0 writes:
- CompositeStaff
- HybridStaff
- StaffBlend
- AssortedStaff
Maybe StaffAxis is the best one.
Of those? Probably. Not that it's all that good. I
2015-08-27 0:45 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Got it. How about one of these:
- AlignmentStaff
- StaffAligner
- ContextAligner
Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
a few other Staff containers do).
-
tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
David Kastrup [hidden email]
Perhaps OneStaff?
\oneVoice _is_ sort of the name for not separating voices vertically.
I can see that, but it still doesn't seem quite right to me. As I've
tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Got it. How about one of these:
- AlignmentStaff
- StaffAligner
- ContextAligner
Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
a few other Staff containers do).
- CompositeStaff
- HybridStaff
- StaffBlend
-
ID: 4576
STATUS: New
SUMMARY: Immediately subsequent DynamicTextSpanners collide at line break
TYPE: Ugly
LABELS:
OWNER:
%%% start message body %%
Hello,
if two DynamicTextSpanners immediately follow one another and the second
one starts at a line
On Aug 25, 2015; 5:05pm James Lowe wrote:
On 25/08/15 18:48, markdblackwell wrote:
Per
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitignore.html
A gitignore file specifies intentionally untracked files that Git
should ignore. Files already tracked by Git are not affected
Aug 23,
On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
David Kastrup [hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=180216i=0 writes:
David Kastrup [hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=180216i=1 writes:
tisimst [hidden email]
Greetings -
I will be out of town, and pretty much out of internet capability, for the
next three Fridays. In other words, I shall not be able to cover August 28,
September 4, or September 11. I apologize for any inconvenience this may
cause.
In gratitude for such a wonderful program and
17 matches
Mail list logo
