Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

2017-06-12 Thread tisimst
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Carl Sorensen-3 [via Lilypond] < ml+s1069038n20373...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > On 6/12/17 4:06 AM, "Federico Bruni" <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > > > > >Il giorno sab 10 giu 2017 alle 2:54, Carl Sorensen <[hidden

Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

2017-06-12 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 12.06.2017 12:06, Federico Bruni wrote: Not in my opinion. The font is feta11 (the font family is feta). The staff height is 11.22 pt. The staff height is 3.9 mm. Hi Carl, are you sure? The context of my report was: commit 18d03fa6a724b0102ccc47d194209802cea02f2e Author: James Lowe

Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

2017-06-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/12/17 4:06 AM, "Federico Bruni" wrote: > > >Il giorno sab 10 giu 2017 alle 2:54, Carl Sorensen >ha scritto: >> On 6/8/17 10:26 AM, "Federico Bruni" wrote: >> >>>

Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

2017-06-12 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno sab 10 giu 2017 alle 2:54, Carl Sorensen ha scritto: On 6/8/17 10:26 AM, "Federico Bruni" wrote: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-siz e.html """ Automatic font weight at different sizes The