Trevor Daniels wrote: > > > Some facts that might have a bearing: > > This was a clean install of Vista, not an upgrade. > This was the very first LilyPond installation on this system. > I had admin priviledges during the install, although removing them later > has no effect on running LilyPond. > The font cache was built in [user]/.lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ and contains > the usual three files. > >
This basically sumarizes my experience. No problem when LilyPond was initially installed, but the slowdown occured with a later install. As discussed in http://www.nabble.com/Vista-problem-td16111578.html http://www.nabble.com/Vista-problem-td16111578.html I would guess this is because [user]/.lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ is no longer being created. No version will now create the font cache. I have also tried all of the suggestions above made by Han-Wen with no change in results. Further, I tried with User Account Control turned of... No effect. At one point I unstalled, manually removed all references in the Registry to LilyPond (which is not to say that I could in fact find them all), with restarts in between... No effect. I have no doubt that something has gotten trashed along the way in Vista. For the time being, the work around suggested in the other thread still seems to be ok. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slow-compile-on-Windows-XP---font-caching-problem--tp15962446p16207045.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond