in a two staff system the placement of grace notes at the same beat is like
regular notes (the quaver gets more space to the main note than the
semiquaver)
So the grace note is optical separated from the main note. it looks like an
aftergrace instead of an grace note
Better: distance to main note i
:
> - Original Message - From: "Martin Straeten"
>
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 6:04 PM
> Subject: Re: exceeding processing time when processing multiple scores within
> onebook
>
>
>> i can reproduce it with OS:
>> Window
i can reproduce it with OS:
Windows XP 32bit
Mac OS X 10.7.2
kind regards,
Martin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
With current stable release 2.14.2 and development release 2.15.27
the processing time exceeds when several scores are typeset within
one book with given numer of systems per page.
Using 2.13.20 the attached sample works fine
(even a real life book with > 30 piano scores can be processed);
with 2.
Am 17. Januar 2012 13:55 schrieb Carl Sorensen :
> On 1/17/12 3:33 AM, "Martin Straeten" wrote:
>
> >here two examples:
> >BWV 544:
> >http://216.129.110.22/files/imglnks/usimg/4/4a/IMSLP01329-BWV0544.pdf
> >old Edition of Bach Gesellschaft
>
> Th
> I'm not top posting.
in 6/8 an 3/4 measure the beamlet of the last/first semiwaver
points to the dotted quaver.
semiquavers should be beamed together like in 2.14.2
%-sample--
\version "2.15.24"
\score {
\relative c'{
\time 6/8
c16 d e f8. c8. d16 e f
\time 3/4
> I'm not top posting.
Autobeaming dotted semiquaver with 64th in tuplet is incorrect for 2.15.23.
Beams of first 64th points to the left instead of beeing connected to the beams
of the 2nd and 3rd 64th.
Maybe this is a side effect of the latest patch for issue 11
(http://code.google.com/p/lilyp
> I'm not top posting.
instead of manual beaming of the first quavers i tried to
exclude the third quaver via \noBeam
expected beaming: [x x] x r [x x x x]
noBeam disables beaming of first quavers
result: x x x r [x x x x]
best regards, Martin
%sample code
\version "2.13.60"
\relative c'{c8 d
> I'm not top posting.
Hi,
in the current development version incipit-staves and main stave doesn't fit.
See sample below:
The alignment is ok with 2.12.2
best regards, Martin
%% misaligned incipits for clefs exceeding staff-lines
\version "2.13.11"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
incipitClef =
#(d
