Here is some more bad typography from major publishers. All of them have it.
<><>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
And some more.
<><>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Not really. The problem with this sample is that this Eulenburg
edition is far too small to really show high typography. While it
leads the eye well, it exhibits far too much other typographical
defects, for example the second and last beam, both presenting those
small white triangles which sh
My point is that the stem lenghts should lead the eye: if the note goes
down the stem goes down, if the note stays the same the stem stays the
same. Ross book maybe a good starting point to this.
My original example would be fine if the phrase ended on the first beat,
but it is supposed to end
d the fourth beat stem is too short. Attached is the lilypond output.
Example:
\relative c'' { d8 c c4 d16 c b8 b4 }
-Pekka Siponen
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Music
Notation, page 411 (it didn't fit as an attachment). It has also a flat
for comparison.
Also, in my preference the default chords should be the same type as
lyrics (serif). It is not good to mix sans and serif for no apparent reason.
-Pekka Siponen
chordfonts.pdf
Description: Adob
> I'm not top posting.
This is a beauty problem when using chords. The volta brackets come above the
chords as should be, but the white space between the brackets gets too large for
my taste.. Maybe if the chords could shift sideways a little when used with
volta brackets? Thus the bracket line wo
> I'm not top posting.
In the notation reference: 2.7.2 Displaying chords,
is a snippet for a simple lead sheet:
<<
\chords { c2 g:sus4 f e }
\relative c'' {
a4 e c8 e r4
b2 c4( d)
}
\addlyrics { One day this shall be free __ }
>>
Why does the following shift the chords below the