Hello list, in comparing the PDF output of the lilypond combo as distributed in the 2.8.1 tarballs (for Linux/X86) with the results generated by my locally comiled LilyPond I found some strange difference: The noteheads in the results from local Lily look like bad bitmaps while those from the distributed Lily don't. On closer examination i found out that the dpf from local Lily do not contain the embedded Emmentaler fonts. I straced the execution of both programs and couldn't find any difference in the invocation of ghostscript that would explain this. BTW, I'm using a locally compiled gs-gpl _with_ the two patches mentioned on the web pages. Any ideas about what's going wrong?
TIA Ralf Mattes _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
