Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and cross-staff beams

2009-10-29 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > There's a message in the deleted bug snippet harakiri-autoknee.ly > which suggests there used to be a problem: > > Autoknee-ing triggers hara-kiri too early. OK, since I can't decide whether to remove it or not, I've just added it to the trac

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and cross-staff beams

2009-09-23 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/9/23 Mats Bengtsson : > I haven't tracked down exactly what has changed, but I had to reduce the > setting of the auto-knee-gap property of Beam from the default value 5.5 to > \override Score.Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #4.75 > to get the kneed beam that was obtained in earlier versions. > Regres

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and cross-staff beams

2009-09-23 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > There doesn't seem to be any regression test > on the combination of \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and kneed beams, so you would > have to invent some yourself. Yeah, I was supposed to add one last year but I forgot :-) http://lists.gnu.org/arc

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and cross-staff beams

2009-09-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I can see the problem you report with version 2.12, but with the latest 2.13 version (compiled from todays GIT), it's even worse, since the beam stays flat also if you don't have \RemoveEmptyStaffContext. I haven't tracked down exactly what has changed, but I had to reduce the setting of the aut