Am 02.04.2017 um 01:26 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble writes:
David wrote:
It would seem more sensible to change overrides to have
tweak syntax and forego the gratuitous equals sign.
That would be an improvement.
It would be sort of a drastic change.
Well, somewhere far
Dan Eble writes:
> David wrote:
>> It would seem more sensible to change overrides to have
>> tweak syntax and forego the gratuitous equals sign.
> That would be an improvement.
It would be sort of a drastic change.
--
David Kastrup
David wrote:
> It would seem more sensible to change overrides to have
> tweak syntax and forego the gratuitous equals sign.
That would be an improvement.
—
Dan
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Dan Eble writes:
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 22:20 , Simon Albrecht wrote:
>>
>>> This command can produce either an \override or a \tweak of
>>> a spanner property.
>>
>> But that’s exactly the point: \alterBroken (and \shape and \offset)
>> can
Am 27.03.2017 um 23:32 schrieb Dan Eble:
This is the current syntax:
\alterBroken property-name #’(before after) GrobName
This would be more consistent with other things:
\alterBroken GrobName.property-name #’(before after)
\alterBroken in that respect is not to be compared with
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 17:32 , Dan Eble wrote:
>
> This is the current syntax:
>
>\alterBroken property-name #’(before after) GrobName
>
> This would be more consistent with other things:
>
>\alterBroken GrobName.property-name #’(before after)
>
Notation reference
Dan Eble writes:
> This is the current syntax:
>
> \alterBroken property-name #’(before after) GrobName
>
> This would be more consistent with other things:
>
> \alterBroken GrobName.property-name #’(before after)
Have you actually read the documentation of
This is the current syntax:
\alterBroken property-name #’(before after) GrobName
This would be more consistent with other things:
\alterBroken GrobName.property-name #’(before after)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org