Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-26 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:06 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > >> There are lots of broken beams in Scriabin's first prelude >> >> The original publisher makes no attempt at consisten

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-25 Thread David Kastrup
m...@apollinemike.com writes: > 3) Aside from what I mention in (2), are there any other criteria > that, in your opinion, seem to govern slope breaking? Could these > criteria vary from work to work, edition to edition, style to style? > Does Elaine Gould have anything to say on the subject? I

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-25 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
errata: more note flat = more not flat On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:06 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > >> There are lots of broken beams in Scriabin's first prelude >> >> The original p

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-25 Thread mike
On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > There are lots of broken beams in Scriabin's first prelude > > The original publisher makes no attempt at consistent slopes. > Peters Edition prints nearly-equal slopes across the lin

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-24 Thread Keith OHara
There are lots of broken beams in Scriabin's first prelude The original publisher makes no attempt at consistent slopes. Peters Edition prints nearly-equal slopes across the line-breaks, but lets the beam height There is a Lilypond

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-22 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Oct 22, 2011, at 11:55 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> On Oct 21, 2011, at 6:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> >>> commit 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf >>> Author: Mike Solomon >>> Date: Fri Oct 21 09:03:43 2011 +0200 >>> >>> Implements consi

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-22 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > On Oct 21, 2011, at 6:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> commit 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf >> Author: Mike Solomon >> Date: Fri Oct 21 09:03:43 2011 +0200 >> >>Implements consistent beam slopes across line breaks. >> >> says >> >>To

Re: \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-22 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Oct 21, 2011, at 6:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > commit 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf > Author: Mike Solomon > Date: Fri Oct 21 09:03:43 2011 +0200 > >Implements consistent beam slopes across line breaks. > > says > >To turn on this feature, use \override Beam #'cons

\override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t should be default

2011-10-21 Thread David Kastrup
commit 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf Author: Mike Solomon Date: Fri Oct 21 09:03:43 2011 +0200 Implements consistent beam slopes across line breaks. says To turn on this feature, use \override Beam #'consistent-slope = ##t. I think that is a mistake: unbroken beams natura