2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output

2004-02-05 Thread Hans Forbrich
On Lilypond 2.1.16 (self compiled). Originally noticed on 2.0.1 Not sure whether these are interrelated or should be reported separately. The attached .ly and .pdf/.dvi) are the original test case(s). Hopefully I've put in slightly more concise test cases in line here. 1: Chorded polyphony wit

2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output

2004-02-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 2: Collision avoidance is different in non-chorded vs chorded polyphony > ( shown in bars (6 vs 7) compared to (9 vs 10)). I believe the chord > case should use the same decision as the single-note case. No. The chord with the dots should always go to the right in thes

2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output

2004-02-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 1: Chorded polyphony with dotted notes in voice 1 misplaces dots (as > shown in attached output bar 7) Fixed. > 3: Starting a score with polyphony seems to generate unnecessary new > contexts. (I discovererd this while eliminating the 'r1' at the > beginning of each s

Re: 2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output

2004-02-06 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hans Forbrich wrote: On Lilypond 2.1.16 (self compiled). Originally noticed on 2.0.1 3: Starting a score with polyphony seems to generate unnecessary new contexts. (I discovererd this while eliminating the 'r1' at the beginning of each system, trying to simplify the test cases - not bothering m

Re: 2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output

2004-02-12 Thread Hans Forbrich
Using the 2.1.20 release: Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 1: Chorded polyphony with dotted notes in voice 1 misplaces dots (as > > shown in attached output bar 7) > > Fixed. > Original test case now works. Thanks. But the actual from my score doesn't, so I've attach

Re: 2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output (more)

2004-02-10 Thread Hans Forbrich
Using the 2.1.20 release: Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 1: Chorded polyphony with dotted notes in voice 1 misplaces dots (as > > shown in attached output bar 7) > > Fixed. > Original test case now works. Thanks. But the actual from my score doesn't, so I've attach

Re: 2.1.6 - wierd polyphony output (more)

2004-02-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > But the actual from my score doesn't, so I've attached the minimum > snippet with several test cases. Each test case is on a staff by > itself: > > 1) the original problem; > 2) swap the two voices - better, but stems in wrong direction > (obviously); > 3) try for