Re: Ambitus not in the beginning

2013-12-04 Thread Marek Klein
2013/11/28 Colin Campbell > I've modified it a bit further, putting the \consists in a \layout context. > This has was added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3702 by Ralph Marek bug squad member ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-l

Re: Ambitus not in the beginning

2013-11-28 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11/28/2013 02:07 PM, pls wrote: On 25.11.2013, at 14:34, Kai Lautenschläger wrote: As you can see in the following not so tiny example inserting the ambitus makes the \RemoveEmptyStaves command ineffective. I reduced your example quite a bit and the problem is still there: \RemoveEmptySta

Re: Ambitus not in the beginning

2013-11-28 Thread Kai Lautenschläger
Hi Patrick, thanks for making that easier to see. Since I am not at all familiar with the procedure once a bug is named a bug (or at least believed to be one), my question would be: is there any ideas for a work-around? I was thinking to somehow manually put the ambitus at the beginning of a s

Re: Ambitus not in the beginning

2013-11-28 Thread pls
On 25.11.2013, at 14:34, Kai Lautenschläger wrote: > As you can see in the following not so tiny example inserting the ambitus > makes the \RemoveEmptyStaves command ineffective. I reduced your example quite a bit and the problem is still there: \RemoveEmptyStaves does not show any effect in sta