Re: Cross-staff notation with tremolos ruins beam positions

On 2020-09-26 9:08 am, Daniel Woodfield wrote: I was trying to write something in which eighth notes with a single tremolo on them (16ths) alternate between staves using \autochange or manual staff change.  Both absolutely wreck the positioning of stems and beams.  For a simple example of the

Cross-staff notation with tremolos ruins beam positions

I was trying to write something in which eighth notes with a single tremolo on them (16ths) alternate between staves using \autochange or manual staff change.  Both absolutely wreck the positioning of stems and beams.  For a simple example of the problem, type in Lilypond 2.20.0: \autochange

Re: Beam Positions

Mats Bengtsson schreef: This clearly looks like a bug, so I forward it to bug-lilypond. fixed in CVS. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com

Re: Beam Positions

This clearly looks like a bug, so I forward it to bug-lilypond. /Mats Quoting Trent Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello again, I'm having trouble with changing the lengths of beams. When I use: \once \override Beam #'positions = #'(1 . 1.5) in the below example I get a strange beamed

Re: Beam Positions

Thanks!! - Original Message - From: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Trent Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bug-lilypond@gnu.org Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:44 PM Subject: Re: Beam Positions | This clearly looks like a bug, so I forward it to bug-lilypond