On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> What would you like it to look like? Can you manually beam it for us?
Hi Carl,
Well, ideally something like c''8.[ d''16] c''2, but even if unbeamed,
I'd rather have a decent 16th note with a flag of sorts :)
Thanks Phil and Xavier!
Rega
"Carl Sorensen" wrote in message
news:c9a9155d.1bbab%c_soren...@byu.edu...
On 3/18/11 12:50 PM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote:
What would you like it to look like? Can you manually beam it for us?
Thanks,
Carl
See my bug report. He'd probably like flags or beams on the quavers and
sem
On 3/18/11 12:50 PM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote:
> Greetings everybody,
>
> I've just stumbled upon the following piece of code, and it took me a
> while to understand what was going wrong (although, granted, I should
> know better).
>
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice { \voiceOne
> \set tieWa
- Original Message -
From: "Xavier Scheuer"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes
On 19 March 2011 12:57, Phil Holmes wrote:
To my somewhat untutored eye, the output l
On 19 March 2011 12:57, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> To my somewhat untutored eye, the output looks what I'd expect. How would
> you expect it to appear?
Yeah, it took me time to understand the expected output as well.
Actually using \autoBeamOff in conjunction with \hideNotes
(and \unHideNotes \
"Valentin Villenave" wrote in message
news:AANLkTikDLUg4isvP_sgCdXZv8p7uLzWgseCrS=mp0...@mail.gmail.com...
Greetings everybody,
I've just stumbled upon the following piece of code, and it took me a
while to understand what was going wrong (although, granted, I should
know better).
\new Staff <
Greetings everybody,
I've just stumbled upon the following piece of code, and it took me a
while to understand what was going wrong (although, granted, I should
know better).
\new Staff <<
\new Voice { \voiceOne
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
c''16~ b''~ 8~ b''2.
}
\new Voice { \voiceTwo
