Re: Bug in 2.21.81 when afterGrace is combined with an isolated duration

2020-12-10 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via bug-lilypond
Am Mittwoch, dem 09.12.2020 um 22:16 +0100 schrieb Mats Bengtsson: > Hi, > > I just tried a larger score in 2.21.81 and found a regression bug > compared to 2.20.0, that's illustrated in the following example: > > \fixed c'{ > e4 8. 16 \afterGrace e2 {d16 e } | % Works fine > f4 4 r2 | > e4 8. 1

Bug in 2.21.81 when afterGrace is combined with an isolated duration

2020-12-09 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hi, I just tried a larger score in 2.21.81 and found a regression bug compared to 2.20.0, that's illustrated in the following example: \fixed c'{ e4 8. 16 \afterGrace e2 {d16 e } | % Works fine f4 4 r2 | e4 8. 16 \afterGrace 2 {d16 e } | % Breaks in 2.21.81, works fine in 2.20.0 f4 4 r2 | }