Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This is another incarnation of Issue 355, which in my opinion is a clear
bug.
However, I'm not equally certain that the bar numbering always is done
the way Paul proposes
and would have to look through my collection of scores to see what is
the most common typesetting
to the 16th and 17th bar unambiguously. There must not be two 16th bars.
Original message
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Sent: 25 Jun 2009 13:31 -07:00
To: Paul de Bruin paul.de.br...@chello.nl
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug report: measure numbering after
Am 26.06.2009, 10:43 Uhr, schrieb Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se:
Does anybody have authoritative information on how the bar numbering
should be done with alternative
endings?
From
Herbert Chlapik: Die Praxix des Notengraphikers,
1987, 2.Auflage 1991, Doblinger Wien - München,
...@percival-music.ca
Sent: 25 Jun 2009 13:31 -07:00
To: Paul de Bruin paul.de.br...@chello.nl
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternativeendings
Please create a minimal example of this; turn on bar numbers on
every bar, and then it should
