> I'm not top posting.
%% BUG in Measure Numbering:
%% after a \repeat ending in two \alternative measures, these two measures
should bear the same number;
%% however, Lilypond gives them subsequent numbers; the next section of the
piece starts with a measure
%% number one too high.
%% Example,
Please create a minimal example of this; turn on bar numbers on
every bar, and then it should be showable in 4-5 bars.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:37:33PM +, Paul de Bruin wrote:
> > I'm not top posting.
>
> %% BUG in Measure Numbering:
> %% after a \repeat ending in two \alt
Dear Mats, Bertalan and Graham,
Flooded with and surprised by instant reactions, I've given the problem (or
is it a bug?) some more thought. Two points of view are possible:
1. The Programmer's view. A measure of music, like any other object in
programming, should have a unique number. No ambig
Added as #785. Now stop talking about what is done most often,
and get a Frog to implement this tweakable option. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Paul de Bruin wrote:
Dear Mats, Bertalan and Graham,
Flooded with and surprised by instant reactions, I've given the
problem (or is it a bug?) some more thought. Two points of view are
possible:
1. The Programmer's view. A measure of music, like any other object in
programming, should have
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> However, I just looked in a book on music typesetting ("Noter", by B. Tyboni,
> which unfortunately only is available in Swedish), which says that it is most
> common to do what you propose, namely to use the same measure numbers both in
> the first and second ending. S
Op zaterdag 27-06-2009 om 14:54 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mats
Bengtsson:
> I could also imagine the conductors view at a rehearsal.
> Still, the
> formulation "most common" indicates that both strategies are used.
Right, so this could be a choice. From my experience in an
orchestra, it of
> Op zaterdag 27-06-2009 om 14:54 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mats
> Bengtsson:
>
> > I could also imagine the conductors view at a rehearsal.
>
Actually I think repeating the bar numbers can make it easier for a conductor
because bar 17 (say) always follows bar 16 both first and second time.
