Input variables and Scheme

2006-09-22 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Either the documentation for 12.2.1 "Input variables and Scheme" is deprecated, or somthing is broken. Using the following input: \version "2.9.19" traLaLa = { c'4 d'4 } #(define newLa (map ly:music-deep-copy (list traLaLa traLaLa))) #(define twice (make-sequ

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-09-22 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Either the documentation for 12.2.1 "Input variables and Scheme" is > deprecated, or somthing is broken. Using the following input: > > \version "2.9.19" > > traLaLa = { c'4 d'4 } > &

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-09-23 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Either the documentation for 12.2.1 "Input variables and Scheme" is >> deprecated, or somthing is broken. Using the following input: >>

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-09-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Michael Welsh Duggan schreef: Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Either the documentation for 12.2.1 "Input variables and Scheme" is deprecated, or somthing is broken. Using the following input: \version &

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-09-24 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Either the documentation for 12.2.1 "Input variables and Scheme" is >>&g

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-10-09 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>

Re: Input variables and Scheme

2006-10-09 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Michael Welsh Duggan schreef: I am not asking that this syntax be used, but am merely giving an example of how the problem might be resolved. Certainly, but it's a backward compatibity problem; we can't implement this in convert-ly. The syntax is more uniform with the rest though. I can't re