Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #3 on issue 1067 by v.villenave: Postfix syntax for repeats
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1067
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.or
Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Patch -Syntax
Comment #2 on issue 1067 by percival.music.ca: Postfix syntax for repeats
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1067
Agreed. I've added it to the list of things to discuss in GLISS.
__
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On a more general note: can we stop the "let's improve the syntax"
> discussions altogether? We've had them for over 10 years, they
> generate a lot of heated bikeshedding discussions, and don't really
> help anything, since they are fu
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1067 by hanwenn: Postfix syntax for repeats
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1067
can we stop the syntax bikeshedding? Thank you.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.
Can we please not do this?
Syntax changes look cute, and in rare case even require little code,
but they are impossible to revert, since we'd be breaking user files.
This needs to be accompanied by a much more thorough analysis whether
this feature is worth the additional perl-esque syntax, all t
Status: Started
Owner: n.puttock
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Patch Syntax
New issue 1067 by v.villenave: Postfix syntax for repeats
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1067
Neil has posted an awesome patch that allows to have
{ music expression } * 4
instead of
\re
