Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed*above* vocal staves

2010-11-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:17:19PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote: So I suggest I insert dynamics and \dynamicUp in just one template - A4.4. ok, sounds fine. Cheers, - Graham ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed*above* vocal staves

2010-11-03 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:52 AM On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:17:19PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote: So I suggest I insert dynamics and \dynamicUp in just one template - A4.4. ok, sounds fine. Snippet modified in LSR. It should appear in the docs after it's

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-11-03 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 1364 by tdanielsmusic: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 I think it would be difficult to cover all circumstances automatically. For example, if the lyrics

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-11-03 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #6 on issue 1364 by v.villenave: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 You're right. It primarily is a documentation matter, and I think you've covered it.

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed*above* vocal staves

2010-11-02 Thread Trevor Daniels
Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:19 AM Graham wrote Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:02 AM I agree with wbsoft. It's easy to mention \dynamicsUp in Notation 2.1 Vocals -- I'd actually be shocked if Trevor hadn't added this already -- Actually I haven't, but I will. I

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-10-27 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1364 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 A slightly more definitive source: http://mpa.org/music_notation/choral_standards

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-10-27 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1364 by v.villenave: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 I'm not sure I agree. The whole point of LilyPond has always been to provide the user with a nearly-ideal output out-of-the-box.

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-10-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham wrote Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:02 AM I agree with wbsoft. It's easy to mention \dynamicsUp in Notation 2.1 Vocals -- I'd actually be shocked if Trevor hadn't added this already -- Actually I haven't, but I will. That said, \dynamicsUp should be added to the vocal templates,

Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-10-26 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low New issue 1364 by v.villenave: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 Janek has just found this link (I don't know if it can be regarded as a

Re: Issue 1364 in lilypond: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves

2010-10-26 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1364 by wbsoft: Enhancement: Dynamics should be printed *above* vocal staves http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1364 I'm not sure if I'd like LilyPond to change the dynamics direction on its own behalf. In my scores I just write a \dynamicUp command when