Comment #41 on issue 1852 by adam.spi...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Phil - this sounds bad. I could try to verify if you explain what a 'null
make doc' is, and how I should attempt to reproduce.
Comment #42 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I was referring to running make doc. Then making no further changes and
waiting 10 minutes, then running make doc again. On my system all
Comment #43 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Phil, the rebuilding of the html pages with every `make doc' is a real
problem, I also mention this problem in issue 1526. I think that I
Comment #44 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I could try this in 2 ways: I'd prefer the first if you could guide me. My
fast build machine is now up-to-date as of yesterday. I assume I
Comment #45 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I think you would do it this way, on the up-to-date machine:
git checkout d30221fa73101baffcb05ec49ec04d366a471824~1
to return to a tree that
Comment #46 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Just done that and get the same result: all HTML files are remade, PDFs are
untouched.
___
Comment #47 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
If you want the output of what I now call the null make doc, please let me
know.
___
Comment #48 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
The output would be interesting to be sure, and I think it should get a
separate issue number. And thanks again, a make doc on your machine
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #49 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I bought a machine to make it possible to make doc quicker - it can build
docs from scratch in about 12
Comment #50 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Issue 2028 raised.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Comment #40 on issue 1852 by philehol...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
This works. Make a small change to one of the sources for the CG, and only
the CG PDF is rebuilt.
However, testing this revealed another
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: ---
Cc: -janek.li...@gmail.com
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_15
Comment #39 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
pushed
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #38 on issue 1852 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Counted down to 20111009
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #36 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852#c36
Build dependencies for .texi files (issue 1852).
Write .dep files containing make dependency rules for .texi and .itexi
files. They
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #35 on issue 1852 by pkx1...@gmail.com: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Comment #33 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852#c33
Build dependencies for .texi files (issue 1852).
Write .dep files containing make dependency rules for .texi files.
These .dep files are
Comment #34 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
New patchset uploaded to http://codereview.appspot.com/5131045
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #29 on issue 1852 by janek.li...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
This seems to work - i see side-by-side diffs of all files:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Comment #32 on issue 1852 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Discussion on Rietveld suggests this isn't quite final, yet.
Comment #28 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Janek,
Please take this seriously. Somebody is trying to help lilypond and is
having technical problems. It's your job to help them past those
Comment #27 on issue 1852 by janek.li...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
But where is /etc/mime.types ?
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Comment #19 on issue 1852 by janek.li...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Julien I did click publish now, hope it works. Do I need to add reviewers?
You don't need to add reviewers, but i still don't see it.
Comment #20 on issue 1852 by janek.li...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
2011/9/27 Janek WarchoĊ janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I have an idea: you have used Graham's new git-cl, didn't you? Maybe
it forgot to add
Comment #21 on issue 1852 by brownian.box: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Please, why Patch-needs_work? Shouldn't it be removed? Please, if this is
fixed, drop fixed_X_Y_Z here instead. Thanks!
Comment #23 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I did use Graham's git-cl since the official one went offline.
I think the patch did not get published to lilypond-de...@gnu.org because I
Comment #24 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I quite agree; sorry, I should have prefixed my comment 22 with
a Janek:. It's his responsibility to get your patch visible.
Comment #26 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Just follow the instructions in comment 0 of issue 1491. Except you want
to fix the handling of .texi files instead of .scm files.
Comment #13 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Since speed is a concern I went with sed. New patch uploaded to
http://codereview.appspot.com/5131045
Comment #14 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
OK apparently git-cl crashed *while* the stuff was being uploaded to
Rietveld. The patch there is complete but you can't see the
Comment #15 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
The sed code might be a bit obscure; here's what it produces for
contributor.dep:
./out/contributor.texi: contributor.texi
Comment #16 on issue 1852 by janek.li...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Hi,
as i'm the formal owner of this issue, i'd like to know what's its current
status. Should 1b99f1907fb77b0f3a0e65725776782c3eeaa025 be
Comment #17 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Old issue applied to .tely files and comment 10 comfirms that it works.
New issue applies to .texi files and is independent of the previous
Updates:
Labels: Patch-needs_work
Comment #18 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
we can't review anything until it's uploaded. See issue 1491.
Comment #10 on issue 1852 by philehol...@googlemail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I've tested whether this works, and can confirm that learning is rebuilt if
tutorial.itely is edited. :-) The only issue is that
Comment #11 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
I must admit that I overlooked .texi files because I assumed all such files
were included files, not main files. I see now that
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_11
Comment #9 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
pushed 1b99f1907fb77b0f3a0e65725776782c3eeaa025
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-push
Comment #8 on issue 1852 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Counted down to 20110914
___
bug-lilypond
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #7 on issue 1852 by pkx1...@gmail.com: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Passes make and reg test - took patch from
Comment #6 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Following guidelines:
git format-patch origin
Attachments:
0001-Fix-issue-1852-manuals-needs-more-explicit-dependenc.patch 1.6 KB
Updates:
Cc: janek.li...@gmail.com
Comment #5 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
ok. Janek will upload this to rietveld so that we can easily review the
patch.
Comment #4 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
Well, not a problem, 2.6 is not really needed so I removed that. In the
meantime I also found another bug, namely that global_options.format
Comment #1 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
lilypond-book produces *.dep files tracking the dependencies of *.tely
project files. These are included into the build process in
Comment #2 on issue 1852 by julien.r...@gmail.com: manuals needs more
explicit dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
(the fix using os..path.relpath requires python 2.6)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Labels: Patch-needs_work
Comment #3 on issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
That is very unfortunate; we currently use python 2.4 in GUB, and updating
to python 2.6 or 2.7 would
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Maintainability Frog
New issue 1852 by percival.music.ca: manuals needs more explicit
dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1852
The build system
make doc
doesn't check if the files in a subdirectory have changed. This
45 matches
Mail list logo
