Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-29 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 More examples as promised. Most of them are from Peters editions. Attachments: example - flats in fourth.png 17.1 KB

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-29 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 I've found a very nice example showing how close sharps can behave. Its taken from an engraving of Chopin g-minor ballade op

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 Ok, i agree that aligning vertically sharps in sixth doesn't look good; especially in Lily engraving (sharps from Feta font a

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 2143 by lemzw...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 It's obviously a matter of tightness... My feeling is that we should delay handling of non-standard alignment (this is, not hav

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 2143 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 Schirmer's engraver for the Carl Mikuli edition followed the rules -- including aligning accidentals in octaves (issue 726) at

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 2143 by philehol...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 FWIW, Elaine Gould allows accidentals a sixth apart to align when the upper one is a flat, but says they should be offset whe

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 2143 by n.putt...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 I agree with Werner. That example looks awful. Unless I'm mistaken, the accurate box code deliberated prevents the sixths fro

Re: Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 2143 by lemzw...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 I strongly disagree to align two sharp signs vertically for a sixth! This looks really bad IMHO, even in the real-world example

Issue 2143 in lilypond: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music

2011-12-28 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: CC: milimet...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement New issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should depend on tightness of music http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143 depending on space available, accidentals should be placed