Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #16 on issue 2343 by elu...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
verified with 2.15.33
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lil
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #15 on issue 2343 by philehol...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Reverted to fixed, since this needs reverifying by checking the source as
pulled from git, not just t
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #14 on issue 2343 by colingh...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Verified fixed in release 2.15.31 using WinXP SP3 x86.
Updates:
Status: Fixed_2_15_31
Labels: -Patch-push Fixed_2_15_31
Comment #12 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Pushed as c37c6f39d18274ccac28ed42559681ea271cc496 to staging.
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #11 on issue 2343 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Counted down to 20120226, please push. If David wants to rename the
variables,
Ian Hulin writes:
> However, if we are going to make manipulating the output filename
> exposed to the LilyPond UI in a \ declaration like \paper,
> \layout or \header then I object violently to using the \paper block.
>
> \bookOutputFilename and \bookOutputSuffix affect all types of file
> produ
On 26/02/12 18:51, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
>
> Comment #10 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
> outputting multiple \books
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
>
> Ian, the patch does not change the use of "output-suffix". As long
> as you don't
Comment #10 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Ian, the patch does not change the use of "output-suffix". As long as you
don't declare a book specific suffix with \bookOutputSuffix (or an
Comment #9 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
I'll see what I can come up with in the context of convert-ly. It would be
conceivable to let "paper-variable" consult a global/parser variab
Comment #8 on issue 2343 by ianhuli...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Just a thought, Before I implemented \bookOutputSuffix, the only way of
controlling the version suffix was to set a Scheme variable o
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #6 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343#c6
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.
___
bug-lilypond mailing l
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #5 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343#c5
Issue 2343: Faulty file-naming when outputting multiple \books
http://codereview.appspot.com/5698050
__
Comment #4 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
As you can easily see when looking at the definition of \bookOutputName and
\bookOutputSuffix, they don't use a parser variable but rather a g
Updates:
Labels: Needs-design
Comment #3 on issue 2343 by ianhuli...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
I just want to add some context to this issue, and maybe save David some
time investigating.
T
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Labels: -Type-Ugly Type-Defect
Comment #2 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
I consider the example pretty minimal. One
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 2343 by elu...@gmail.com: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
- this is not a minimal example!
- where do you find the evidence that assigning a whole \book, \layout,
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Ugly
New issue 2343 by ma...@gregoriana.sk: Faulty file-naming when outputting
multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Reported by Michael Hendry:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-02/msg00951.html
Fo
17 matches
Mail list logo
