Comment #5 on issue 946 by percival.music.ca: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
Later suggestions:
we could also try making the html docs without the regtests. Snippets are
a main
manual, so I'm reluctant to omit them. Although I suppose we could
Comment #4 on issue 946 by john.mandereau: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
I was talking about the compression format, not the contents format; I
surely agree
with distributing docballs with only HTML or PDF docs in addition to
current one.
--
Comment #3 on issue 946 by percival.music.ca: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
What about people who want all pdf docs? There's no point them downloading
a tarball
that has all the HTML docs and png images. Similarly, if somebody knows
they pref
Comment #2 on issue 946 by john.mandereau: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
I don't understand why we should distribute docballs in a format other than
a bzipped
tarball, and even less when it comes to provide several formats: our docs
are so huge
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Other Type-Build
Comment #1 on issue 946 by percival.music.ca: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Other Priority-Postponed
New issue 946 by percival.music.ca: build tarballs of docs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=946
We want tarballs (or maybe zip, if windows doesn't support .tar.bz2) of:
- all split HTML docs
- all big HTML docs
